Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18501 - 18510 of 69114 for he.
Search results 18501 - 18510 of 69114 for he.
State v. Thomas G. Henkel
motion. He raises a number of issues, including ineffective assistance of counsel, whether the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3194 - 2005-03-31
motion. He raises a number of issues, including ineffective assistance of counsel, whether the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3194 - 2005-03-31
Da Vang v. Phil Kingston
the possibility of parole. He requested that the prison business office terminate his release account
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20740 - 2005-12-21
the possibility of parole. He requested that the prison business office terminate his release account
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20740 - 2005-12-21
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence J. Gegare
because he was seized by Veeser in the absence of any grounds to justify a reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13563 - 2017-09-21
because he was seized by Veeser in the absence of any grounds to justify a reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13563 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daniel Anderson
jumping charges and from the trial court’s order denying postconviction relief.[1] He claims that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10226 - 2005-03-31
jumping charges and from the trial court’s order denying postconviction relief.[1] He claims that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10226 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of Kronenwetter Police Department testified. Rasmussen stated that he was working the midnight shift patrol when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122864 - 2014-09-29
of Kronenwetter Police Department testified. Rasmussen stated that he was working the midnight shift patrol when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122864 - 2014-09-29
State v. Lawrence A. Williams
. The issue is whether Williams was seized under the Fourth Amendment when he was questioned and consented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3626 - 2005-03-31
. The issue is whether Williams was seized under the Fourth Amendment when he was questioned and consented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3626 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jeffrey L. Sprewell v. Gary R. McCaughtry
. The conduct report stated: On the above date and time I was approached by inmate Sprewell #036847 he asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14073 - 2014-09-15
. The conduct report stated: On the above date and time I was approached by inmate Sprewell #036847 he asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14073 - 2014-09-15
State v. Donald G. Kester
, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b), Stats.[1] He raises the following issues on appeal: (1) the officer's stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11168 - 2005-03-31
, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b), Stats.[1] He raises the following issues on appeal: (1) the officer's stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11168 - 2005-03-31
State v. Floyd Hopkins
. § 943.20(1)(a), and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20004 - 2005-10-24
. § 943.20(1)(a), and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20004 - 2005-10-24
Lorell E. Smith v. Westwood Estates, Inc.
, that there was no evidence to support the jury’s finding that he was 75% contributorily negligent, and that the $20,000 award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11978 - 2005-03-31
, that there was no evidence to support the jury’s finding that he was 75% contributorily negligent, and that the $20,000 award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11978 - 2005-03-31