Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18511 - 18520 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18511 - 18520 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo. See Prent Corp. v. Martek Holdings, Inc., 2000 WI App 194, ¶9, 238 Wis. 2d 777
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86700 - 2012-09-04
that this court reviews de novo. See Prent Corp. v. Martek Holdings, Inc., 2000 WI App 194, ¶9, 238 Wis. 2d 777
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86700 - 2012-09-04
State v. Jamie M. Grosse
for the same incident violated his double jeopardy rights. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11116 - 2005-03-31
for the same incident violated his double jeopardy rights. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11116 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional standard de novo. Id. Discussion ¶7 Under the Fourth Amendment to the United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41714 - 2009-09-30
the constitutional standard de novo. Id. Discussion ¶7 Under the Fourth Amendment to the United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41714 - 2009-09-30
State v. Orzell P. Grinnage
is an issue this court reviews de novo. See id. at 127-28, 449 N.W.2d at 848
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14260 - 2005-03-31
is an issue this court reviews de novo. See id. at 127-28, 449 N.W.2d at 848
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14260 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony John Doty
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7511 - 2005-03-31
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7511 - 2005-03-31
Float-Rite Park, Inc. v. Village of Somerset
to the constitutionality of § 11.09(4) presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Urmanski v. Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2699 - 2005-03-31
to the constitutionality of § 11.09(4) presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Urmanski v. Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2699 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric Garcia
. Whether a search is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, however, is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7313 - 2005-03-31
. Whether a search is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, however, is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7313 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael J. Lindholm
de novo. See State v. Fry, 129 Wis. 2d 301, 305, 385 N.W.2d 196, 199 (Ct. App. 1985). Sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15938 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See State v. Fry, 129 Wis. 2d 301, 305, 385 N.W.2d 196, 199 (Ct. App. 1985). Sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15938 - 2005-03-31
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Teresita J.
” is a question of law which we determine de novo. Cf. Joni B. v. State, 202 Wis.2d 1, 12, 549 N.W.2d 411, 415
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12197 - 2005-03-31
” is a question of law which we determine de novo. Cf. Joni B. v. State, 202 Wis.2d 1, 12, 549 N.W.2d 411, 415
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12197 - 2005-03-31
Seidel Tanning Corporation v. City of Milwaukee
have been instructed on res ipsa loquitur is a question of law that we review de novo. See Lecander v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16035 - 2005-03-31
have been instructed on res ipsa loquitur is a question of law that we review de novo. See Lecander v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16035 - 2005-03-31