Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18511 - 18520 of 68502 for did.
Search results 18511 - 18520 of 68502 for did.
James Sarlund v. Kimberly Mork
for violating that order, and that she did so to retaliate against Sarlund because of the "informant role" he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9984 - 2005-03-31
for violating that order, and that she did so to retaliate against Sarlund because of the "informant role" he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9984 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mary C. Rath
testimony. Rath did not testify. ¶4 The trial court rendered an extensive, well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2792 - 2005-03-31
testimony. Rath did not testify. ¶4 The trial court rendered an extensive, well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2792 - 2005-03-31
Michael H. Lauritzen v. Richard Gohlke
what the receiver did or did not do to discover illegal activities. The argument is meritless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11875 - 2005-03-31
what the receiver did or did not do to discover illegal activities. The argument is meritless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11875 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, the circuit court did not specifically inform Parker of the maximum potential penalty. However, that provides
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140294 - 2015-04-20
, the circuit court did not specifically inform Parker of the maximum potential penalty. However, that provides
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140294 - 2015-04-20
[PDF]
State v. John S. Spicer
where the sexual assault occurred. The error did not lead to the introduction of damaging evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21627 - 2017-09-21
where the sexual assault occurred. The error did not lead to the introduction of damaging evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21627 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Peter C. Ramuta
asked Ramuta if he had read and understood the plea questionnaire form, and he said he did. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5603 - 2017-09-19
asked Ramuta if he had read and understood the plea questionnaire form, and he said he did. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5603 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
shots and was hit twice. Ates did not see anyone else with a shotgun or argue with anyone else
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56128 - 2014-09-15
shots and was hit twice. Ates did not see anyone else with a shotgun or argue with anyone else
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56128 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the postconviction hearing that he did not think Jakubiec told him about Darrell’s potential testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173441 - 2017-09-21
at the postconviction hearing that he did not think Jakubiec told him about Darrell’s potential testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173441 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, finding that Froust did not make a prima facie showing that she lacked substantial capacity either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106669 - 2014-01-14
, finding that Froust did not make a prima facie showing that she lacked substantial capacity either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106669 - 2014-01-14
State v. Michael D. Gattie
that sentence. We conclude that the circuit court did not misuse its sentencing discretion, and we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20953 - 2006-01-17
that sentence. We conclude that the circuit court did not misuse its sentencing discretion, and we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20953 - 2006-01-17