Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18521 - 18530 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18521 - 18530 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a de novo review of the commissioner’s order. The circuit court vacated the original order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078106 - 2026-02-17
a de novo review of the commissioner’s order. The circuit court vacated the original order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078106 - 2026-02-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
we decide de novo. See id. at 236-37. Deficient Performance. ¶13 An attorney’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82390 - 2014-09-15
we decide de novo. See id. at 236-37. Deficient Performance. ¶13 An attorney’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82390 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Frank P. Howard
case. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See Schulz v. Ystad, 155 Wis.2d 574, 596
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8790 - 2017-09-19
case. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See Schulz v. Ystad, 155 Wis.2d 574, 596
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8790 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence P. Peters, Jr.
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Woods, 117 Wis. 2d 701, 715-16, 345 N.W.2d 457
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17536 - 2017-09-21
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Woods, 117 Wis. 2d 701, 715-16, 345 N.W.2d 457
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17536 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Christopher L. Berry
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶6 Berry argues that Terrance’s mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4697 - 2017-09-19
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶6 Berry argues that Terrance’s mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4697 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175632 - 2017-09-21
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175632 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 56
. “Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo.” State ex rel. West v. Bartow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143699 - 2017-09-21
. “Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo.” State ex rel. West v. Bartow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143699 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
William J. Faber v. Josephine W. Musser
This court reviews under a de novo standard a legislatively created entity's determination of its own
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17007 - 2017-09-21
This court reviews under a de novo standard a legislatively created entity's determination of its own
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17007 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Lee Davis
. ¶9 The interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. DOR v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2445 - 2017-09-19
. ¶9 The interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. DOR v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2445 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of law for our de novo review. See State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184810 - 2017-09-21
of law for our de novo review. See State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184810 - 2017-09-21