Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18521 - 18530 of 65171 for or b.
Search results 18521 - 18530 of 65171 for or b.
Clarence Pelton v. Division of Hearing and Appeals
. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11718 - 2005-03-31
. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11718 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John R. Martin
in violation of §§ 948.02(2), 948.09 and 946.49(1)(b), STATS.1 In appeal no. 96-2416-CR-NM, Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11307 - 2017-09-19
in violation of §§ 948.02(2), 948.09 and 946.49(1)(b), STATS.1 In appeal no. 96-2416-CR-NM, Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11307 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Machine Tool Technologies, Inc., d/b/a Mac-Tech, appeals from a judgment denying its request
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227434 - 2018-11-21
). Machine Tool Technologies, Inc., d/b/a Mac-Tech, appeals from a judgment denying its request
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227434 - 2018-11-21
[PDF]
Vicki L. Thomas v. Frederick W. Thomas
be prepared, dated and signed within five days of the hearing date. (b) The motion for review shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12645 - 2017-09-21
be prepared, dated and signed within five days of the hearing date. (b) The motion for review shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12645 - 2017-09-21
State v. Damon Roundtree
not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion. B. Due Process. Roundtree also claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10380 - 2005-03-31
not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion. B. Due Process. Roundtree also claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10380 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Kenneth B. Burmeister
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101941 - 2013-09-16
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Kenneth B. Burmeister
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101941 - 2013-09-16
[PDF]
State v. Norgie Vieras
with a weapon, as a repeater contrary to §§ 941.30(2), 939.63 and 939.62(1)(b), STATS., and two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9528 - 2017-09-19
with a weapon, as a repeater contrary to §§ 941.30(2), 939.63 and 939.62(1)(b), STATS., and two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9528 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jeffrey W. Wiseman v. Gary R. McCaughtry
jurisdiction; (b) the hearing officer acted according to law; (c) the hearing officer’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11261 - 2017-09-19
jurisdiction; (b) the hearing officer acted according to law; (c) the hearing officer’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11261 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Raymond Lord, Jr.
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21065 - 2017-09-21
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21065 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jason J. Hulbert
to WIS. STAT. § 961.41(3g)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5936 - 2017-09-19
to WIS. STAT. § 961.41(3g)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5936 - 2017-09-19