Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18521 - 18530 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 18521 - 18530 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
the divorce trial date; (2) erroneously exercised its discretion by refusing to adjourn the trial; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45055 - 2014-09-15
the divorce trial date; (2) erroneously exercised its discretion by refusing to adjourn the trial; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45055 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
postconviction motion. Coffee contends that the trial court erred when it refused to give a lesser-included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=418069 - 2021-08-31
postconviction motion. Coffee contends that the trial court erred when it refused to give a lesser-included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=418069 - 2021-08-31
[PDF]
State v. Scott J. Kilcoyne
. Scott J. Kilcoyne appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, for third-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12744 - 2017-09-21
. Scott J. Kilcoyne appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, for third-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12744 - 2017-09-21
State v. Constantine F. Weimer
accepted as true the facts as found by the trial court.[2] The trial court found most credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19094 - 2005-07-25
accepted as true the facts as found by the trial court.[2] The trial court found most credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19094 - 2005-07-25
State v. Shawn Virlee
] and an order denying his motion for post-trial relief. Virlee argues (1) ch. 980 violates due process because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4807 - 2005-03-31
] and an order denying his motion for post-trial relief. Virlee argues (1) ch. 980 violates due process because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4807 - 2005-03-31
Cynthia Hoekman v. Marvin Hoekman
appeals an order awarding her maintenance of $350 per month for three years. She claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11461 - 2005-03-31
appeals an order awarding her maintenance of $350 per month for three years. She claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11461 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, the defendant would not have pled no contest and would have insisted on going to trial. Hill v. Lockhart, 474
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53821 - 2010-08-30
, the defendant would not have pled no contest and would have insisted on going to trial. Hill v. Lockhart, 474
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53821 - 2010-08-30
State v. Orzell P. Grinnage
was entitled to a mistrial; (3) whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14260 - 2005-03-31
was entitled to a mistrial; (3) whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14260 - 2005-03-31
Linda M. Pederson v. Jerry Anibas
that the trial court’s findings were clearly erroneous. He further argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3206 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court’s findings were clearly erroneous. He further argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3206 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
procedural due process when it expedited the divorce trial date; (2) erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45055 - 2009-12-28
procedural due process when it expedited the divorce trial date; (2) erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45055 - 2009-12-28