Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18531 - 18540 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18531 - 18540 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s decision as to whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95661 - 2014-09-15
court’s decision as to whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95661 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Roosevelt Manuel
for a Franks hearing is subject to de novo review. See State v. Fischer, 147 Wis.2d 694, 702, 433 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11314 - 2017-09-19
for a Franks hearing is subject to de novo review. See State v. Fischer, 147 Wis.2d 694, 702, 433 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11314 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John S.
procedures were not constitutionally infirm. ¶16 Constitutional issues in TPR cases are reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7369 - 2017-09-20
procedures were not constitutionally infirm. ¶16 Constitutional issues in TPR cases are reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7369 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Scott Buyeske v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company
decide de novo. Riccobono v. Seven Star, Inc., 2000 WI App 74, ¶7, 234 Wis. 2d 374, 610 N.W.2d 501
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4427 - 2017-09-19
decide de novo. Riccobono v. Seven Star, Inc., 2000 WI App 74, ¶7, 234 Wis. 2d 374, 610 N.W.2d 501
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4427 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13176 - 2017-09-21
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13176 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. “Whether a contract is ambiguous is itself a question of law” that we review de novo. Wausau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219661 - 2018-09-25
. “Whether a contract is ambiguous is itself a question of law” that we review de novo. Wausau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219661 - 2018-09-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” State v. Phillips, 2009 WI App 179, ¶17, 322 Wis. 2d 576, 778 N.W.2d 157. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261624 - 2020-05-27
.” State v. Phillips, 2009 WI App 179, ¶17, 322 Wis. 2d 576, 778 N.W.2d 157. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261624 - 2020-05-27
[PDF]
State v. Paul L. Vogel
of law this court decides de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d 180, 195, 577 N.W.2d 794, 801
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14683 - 2017-09-21
of law this court decides de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d 180, 195, 577 N.W.2d 794, 801
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14683 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Mach v. Allison, 2003 WI App 11, ¶14, 259
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163454 - 2017-09-21
. DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Mach v. Allison, 2003 WI App 11, ¶14, 259
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163454 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Anthony John Doty
review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. If, however: “the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7511 - 2017-09-20
review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. If, however: “the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7511 - 2017-09-20