Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18541 - 18550 of 30164 for de.

State v. Christopher L. Logan
). The application of the facts to the constitutional principles is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6854 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael Strutz
was voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently entered is a question of constitutional fact and is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14593 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kirk L. Griese
, upholding them if not clearly erroneous, and then reviews the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20532 - 2005-12-06

[PDF] State v. Travis Allen
. In Wisconsin, however, we review those determinations de novo. See id. The State also has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18461 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
jurisdiction is a question of law, which is reviewable de novo. See Dragoo v. Dragoo, 99 Wis. 2d 42, 43, 298
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45677 - 2010-01-12

COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105815 - 2013-12-18

Associates Financial Services Company of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Ora Jean Brown
judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4716 - 2005-03-31

Associates Financial Services Company of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Ora Jean Brown
judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4717 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
interpret ยง 343.303. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95705 - 2013-04-23

[PDF] Mary C. Volker v. Oliver A. Pentinmaki, Jr.
is de minimis, and does not constitute grounds for any sanction against the guardian. Finally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8372 - 2017-09-19