Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18541 - 18550 of 29713 for des.
Search results 18541 - 18550 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
Norman L. Zimdars v. Margaret A. VanCleave
is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. at ¶26. ¶6 In Washington, the court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5948 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. at ¶26. ¶6 In Washington, the court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5948 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court has applied the correct legal standard is a question of law reviewed de novo.” Landwehr v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798543 - 2024-05-09
court has applied the correct legal standard is a question of law reviewed de novo.” Landwehr v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798543 - 2024-05-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
corrections officers on the job and, thus, the correct standard of review is de novo. LIRC argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698360 - 2023-09-06
corrections officers on the job and, thus, the correct standard of review is de novo. LIRC argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698360 - 2023-09-06
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. See Fond du Lac County v. Elizabeth M. P., 2003 WI App 232, ¶11, 267 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48124 - 2010-03-17
of law that we review de novo. See Fond du Lac County v. Elizabeth M. P., 2003 WI App 232, ¶11, 267 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48124 - 2010-03-17
State v. Frank P. Howard
to the present case. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See Schulz v. Ystad, 155 Wis.2d 574, 596
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8790 - 2005-03-31
to the present case. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See Schulz v. Ystad, 155 Wis.2d 574, 596
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8790 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lisa K. Kraus
). However, whether those facts establish probable cause to arrest is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15478 - 2005-03-31
). However, whether those facts establish probable cause to arrest is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15478 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
cause, we uphold the findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous and review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35613 - 2014-09-15
cause, we uphold the findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous and review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35613 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
an “end-around” the statutory time period to appeal and de facto extend that time period by several months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141811 - 2015-05-19
an “end-around” the statutory time period to appeal and de facto extend that time period by several months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141811 - 2015-05-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶3 This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054647 - 2025-12-23
. ¶3 This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054647 - 2025-12-23
State v. John R. Stambaugh
., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Beiersdorf, 208 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11922 - 2005-03-31
., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Beiersdorf, 208 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11922 - 2005-03-31