Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18541 - 18550 of 29942 for des.
Search results 18541 - 18550 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Richard R. Yakes
). If we accept the trial court’s factual findings, we review de novo the constitutional significance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13646 - 2017-09-21
). If we accept the trial court’s factual findings, we review de novo the constitutional significance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13646 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Virtis A.
review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6667 - 2017-09-20
review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6667 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Associates Financial Services Company of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Ora Jean Brown
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4716 - 2017-09-19
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4716 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Associates Financial Services Company of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Ora Jean Brown
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4717 - 2017-09-19
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4717 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., ¶30. ¶16 We agree with the State that the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279422 - 2020-08-18
is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., ¶30. ¶16 We agree with the State that the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279422 - 2020-08-18
[PDF]
State v. Roger M. Spencer
Spencer without considering the PBT results. No. 00-0975-CR 7 law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2483 - 2017-09-19
Spencer without considering the PBT results. No. 00-0975-CR 7 law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2483 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
grant of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same methodology employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=321938 - 2021-01-13
grant of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same methodology employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=321938 - 2021-01-13
State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
and the application of a statute are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Wagner Mobile, Inc. v. City
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16969 - 2005-03-31
and the application of a statute are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Wagner Mobile, Inc. v. City
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16969 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darryl H. Stegall
relationships were, in context, de minimis and proper. At sentencing, the trial court first considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6065 - 2005-03-31
relationships were, in context, de minimis and proper. At sentencing, the trial court first considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6065 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Carole F. Edland v. Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance Corporation
interprets a statute under a de novo standard, without deference to the decision of the court of appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17130 - 2017-09-21
interprets a statute under a de novo standard, without deference to the decision of the court of appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17130 - 2017-09-21