Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18541 - 18550 of 29942 for des.
Search results 18541 - 18550 of 29942 for des.
State v. Peter Jay Bartram
court’s determination is a legal conclusion and is therefore subject to our de novo review. Bartram
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15790 - 2005-03-31
court’s determination is a legal conclusion and is therefore subject to our de novo review. Bartram
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15790 - 2005-03-31
County of Langlade v. Michael N. Kaster
to a particular set of facts are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Block Iron & Supply Co., 183 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9748 - 2005-03-31
to a particular set of facts are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Block Iron & Supply Co., 183 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9748 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
decides de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶11 We will independently review whether claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32944 - 2008-06-04
decides de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶11 We will independently review whether claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32944 - 2008-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable inference are both questions of law, which we review de novo.”). The record does, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33177 - 2008-06-25
reasonable inference are both questions of law, which we review de novo.”). The record does, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33177 - 2008-06-25
State v. John Doe
of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7396 - 2005-05-09
of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7396 - 2005-05-09
State v. William H. Roberts
proved those prior convictions. Both issues present questions of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4089 - 2005-03-31
proved those prior convictions. Both issues present questions of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4089 - 2005-03-31
County of Dodge v. Michael J.K.
which we review de novo without deference to the trial court's decision. State v. Sostre, 198 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11222 - 2005-03-31
which we review de novo without deference to the trial court's decision. State v. Sostre, 198 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11222 - 2005-03-31
Ann Lee Bogan v. Price County
review de novo. Ottinger v. Pinel, 215 Wis.2d 265, 272, 572 N.W.2d 519, 521 (Ct. App. 1997). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13625 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Ottinger v. Pinel, 215 Wis.2d 265, 272, 572 N.W.2d 519, 521 (Ct. App. 1997). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13625 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo a grant of summary judgment, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88606 - 2012-10-29
reviews de novo a grant of summary judgment, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88606 - 2012-10-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to believe standard is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. ¶11 The circuit court relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96840 - 2014-09-15
to believe standard is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. ¶11 The circuit court relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96840 - 2014-09-15