Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18541 - 18550 of 50070 for our.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
it was not bound by the plea negotiations or the PSI recommendation. Our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131671 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2016AP2235-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210640 - 2018-04-03

[PDF] State v. Jeriline Campbell
our independent review of the undisputed facts, we conclude that under the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3151 - 2017-09-19

State v. Jacob D. Ward
court and our review is limited to whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7473 - 2005-03-31

State v. Larry W. Norris
burglary count, consecutively, and eight years consecutive on the Class B burglary. Following our supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11171 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
(1r). Our determination that there is no merit to a claim that the sentence was based on inaccurate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137101 - 2015-03-10

Patricia v. Rural Mutual Insurance Company
. Our conclusion that a recreational motor vehicle is not included within the literal terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10342 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. However, Spangler contends our analysis was “fatally flawed,” and asks us to overrule Hartnek. We have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44959 - 2009-12-22

State v. Eugene Keeler
prejudicial effect. Id. Here, as indicated by our discussion regarding joinder, evidence from the assaults
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8070 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
possibility is a possibility which is sufficient to undermine our confidence in the outcome. See id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30488 - 2007-10-01