Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18551 - 18560 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18551 - 18560 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous. Id. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶8 Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85795 - 2014-09-15
erroneous. Id. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶8 Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85795 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
restitution presents a question of statutory interpretation subject to de novo review. State v. Ziegler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622237 - 2023-02-14
restitution presents a question of statutory interpretation subject to de novo review. State v. Ziegler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622237 - 2023-02-14
[PDF]
Loss Prevention Systems v. Alpha Omega Security, Inc.
met. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13268 - 2017-09-21
met. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13268 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Fontaine L. Baker
mixed questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶10 If an appellant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19095 - 2017-09-21
mixed questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶10 If an appellant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19095 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Soto, 2012 WI 93, ¶14, 343 Wis. 2d 43
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239679 - 2019-04-30
. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Soto, 2012 WI 93, ¶14, 343 Wis. 2d 43
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239679 - 2019-04-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s decision as to whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95661 - 2014-09-15
court’s decision as to whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95661 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Roosevelt Manuel
for a Franks hearing is subject to de novo review. See State v. Fischer, 147 Wis.2d 694, 702, 433 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11314 - 2017-09-19
for a Franks hearing is subject to de novo review. See State v. Fischer, 147 Wis.2d 694, 702, 433 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11314 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John S.
procedures were not constitutionally infirm. ¶16 Constitutional issues in TPR cases are reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7369 - 2017-09-20
procedures were not constitutionally infirm. ¶16 Constitutional issues in TPR cases are reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7369 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Scott Buyeske v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company
decide de novo. Riccobono v. Seven Star, Inc., 2000 WI App 74, ¶7, 234 Wis. 2d 374, 610 N.W.2d 501
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4427 - 2017-09-19
decide de novo. Riccobono v. Seven Star, Inc., 2000 WI App 74, ¶7, 234 Wis. 2d 374, 610 N.W.2d 501
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4427 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13176 - 2017-09-21
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13176 - 2017-09-21