Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18561 - 18570 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18561 - 18570 of 29823 for des.
State v. Michael J. Lindholm
de novo. See State v. Fry, 129 Wis. 2d 301, 305, 385 N.W.2d 196, 199 (Ct. App. 1985). Sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15938 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See State v. Fry, 129 Wis. 2d 301, 305, 385 N.W.2d 196, 199 (Ct. App. 1985). Sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15938 - 2005-03-31
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Teresita J.
” is a question of law which we determine de novo. Cf. Joni B. v. State, 202 Wis.2d 1, 12, 549 N.W.2d 411, 415
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12197 - 2005-03-31
” is a question of law which we determine de novo. Cf. Joni B. v. State, 202 Wis.2d 1, 12, 549 N.W.2d 411, 415
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12197 - 2005-03-31
Seidel Tanning Corporation v. City of Milwaukee
have been instructed on res ipsa loquitur is a question of law that we review de novo. See Lecander v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16035 - 2005-03-31
have been instructed on res ipsa loquitur is a question of law that we review de novo. See Lecander v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16035 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶12. Discussion ¶6 Skau argues that police did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31892 - 2008-02-20
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶12. Discussion ¶6 Skau argues that police did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31892 - 2008-02-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a legal question that we review de novo. Xerox Corp. v. DOR, 2009 WI App 113, ¶12, 321 Wis. 2d 181, 772
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037089 - 2025-11-18
is a legal question that we review de novo. Xerox Corp. v. DOR, 2009 WI App 113, ¶12, 321 Wis. 2d 181, 772
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037089 - 2025-11-18
Edwin Gratz v. James L. Gratz
. We review a decision to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10804 - 2005-03-31
. We review a decision to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10804 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
those facts satisfy constitutional standards is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29452 - 2007-06-20
those facts satisfy constitutional standards is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29452 - 2007-06-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
, our review is de novo. Id., ¶39. 1 All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35714 - 2014-09-15
, our review is de novo. Id., ¶39. 1 All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35714 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute present questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Arberry, 2018 WI 7, ¶14, 379 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222238 - 2018-10-16
of a statute present questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Arberry, 2018 WI 7, ¶14, 379 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222238 - 2018-10-16
[PDF]
Elizabeth Wilson v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
judgment motions de novo, applying the same methodology used in the trial court. Jankee v. Clark County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2149 - 2017-09-19
judgment motions de novo, applying the same methodology used in the trial court. Jankee v. Clark County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2149 - 2017-09-19