Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18561 - 18570 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). Whether a defendant has been denied this right is a constitutional issue that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247603 - 2019-10-01

[PDF] William J. Adney v. USAA Property & Casualty Insurance
as the trial court and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4264 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Milwaukee Police Association v. Nannette H. Hegerty
of statutory application, which is subject to our de novo review. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7051 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
and punitive damages of $9,000. Elroy appeals. Discussion ¶11 We review the grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29282 - 2007-07-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
de novo. See State v. Hegwood, 113 Wis. 2d 544, 546-47, 335 N.W.2d 399 (1983); Harbor, 333 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155860 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
. Whether those facts constitute reasonable suspicion, however, is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46270 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous. Id. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶8 Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85795 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
restitution presents a question of statutory interpretation subject to de novo review. State v. Ziegler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622237 - 2023-02-14

[PDF] Loss Prevention Systems v. Alpha Omega Security, Inc.
met. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13268 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Fontaine L. Baker
mixed questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶10 If an appellant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19095 - 2017-09-21