Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18561 - 18570 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 18561 - 18570 of 58492 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
filing any action to recover their fees. The trial court denied the motion on the basis that it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139585 - 2015-04-13
filing any action to recover their fees. The trial court denied the motion on the basis that it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139585 - 2015-04-13
Langlade County v. Jessi A.
with respect to consideration of evidence of post-filing events; (2) she should have received a separate trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4288 - 2005-03-31
with respect to consideration of evidence of post-filing events; (2) she should have received a separate trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4288 - 2005-03-31
Cynthia Hoekman v. Marvin Hoekman
appeals an order awarding her maintenance of $350 per month for three years. She claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11461 - 2005-03-31
appeals an order awarding her maintenance of $350 per month for three years. She claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11461 - 2005-03-31
State v. William H. Roberts
OAR charge. ¶6 The trial court imposed 360 days in jail for the OWI, along
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4090 - 2005-03-31
OAR charge. ¶6 The trial court imposed 360 days in jail for the OWI, along
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4090 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Linda M. Pederson v. Jerry Anibas
that the trial court’s findings were clearly erroneous. He further argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3206 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court’s findings were clearly erroneous. He further argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3206 - 2017-09-19
State v. Guenther Kirchhuebel
] We conclude the trial court did not err in finding that Kirchhuebel had not established he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13966 - 2005-03-31
] We conclude the trial court did not err in finding that Kirchhuebel had not established he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13966 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary J. Hazen
within the trial court’s discretion. See State v. Farrell, 226 Wis. 2d 447, 453-54, 595 N.W.2d 64 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2770 - 2005-03-31
within the trial court’s discretion. See State v. Farrell, 226 Wis. 2d 447, 453-54, 595 N.W.2d 64 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2770 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Guenther Kirchhuebel
breath due to a physical disability. See § 343.305(9)(a)5.c, STATS.2 We conclude the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13966 - 2014-09-15
breath due to a physical disability. See § 343.305(9)(a)5.c, STATS.2 We conclude the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13966 - 2014-09-15
State v. Shawn Virlee
] and an order denying his motion for post-trial relief. Virlee argues (1) ch. 980 violates due process because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4807 - 2005-03-31
] and an order denying his motion for post-trial relief. Virlee argues (1) ch. 980 violates due process because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4807 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
homicide; (2) violated Love’s right to a fair trial by its conduct during and after testimony given by his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109234 - 2014-03-19
homicide; (2) violated Love’s right to a fair trial by its conduct during and after testimony given by his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109234 - 2014-03-19