Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18571 - 18580 of 30164 for de.
Search results 18571 - 18580 of 30164 for de.
State v. John R. Stambaugh
., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Beiersdorf, 208 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11922 - 2005-03-31
., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Beiersdorf, 208 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11922 - 2005-03-31
State v. Todd Fugate
that we review de novo. Id. at 128. Lastly, we need not address both Strickland prongs if the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5965 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. Id. at 128. Lastly, we need not address both Strickland prongs if the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5965 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72472 - 2011-10-19
This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72472 - 2011-10-19
[PDF]
State v. Travis Allen
. In Wisconsin, however, we review those determinations de novo. See id. The State also has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18461 - 2017-09-21
. In Wisconsin, however, we review those determinations de novo. See id. The State also has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18461 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at a municipal court trial, she appealed for a trial de novo in the Waukesha County Circuit Court. There she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234159 - 2019-02-06
at a municipal court trial, she appealed for a trial de novo in the Waukesha County Circuit Court. There she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234159 - 2019-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. Id., ¶25. ¶10 In Sauk County v. S.A.M., the supreme court held that appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913972 - 2025-02-12
reviews de novo. Id., ¶25. ¶10 In Sauk County v. S.A.M., the supreme court held that appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913972 - 2025-02-12
State v. Outagamie County Board of Adjustment
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: john a. des jardins, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13879 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: john a. des jardins, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13879 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 67
. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s rulings on summary judgment, and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49357 - 2011-08-21
. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s rulings on summary judgment, and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49357 - 2011-08-21
Joseph P. Krause v. Myre Electric, Inc.
of statutory interpretation, a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kirch, 222 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2118 - 2005-03-31
of statutory interpretation, a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kirch, 222 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2118 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶8 Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. DOR v. River City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550082 - 2022-08-02
¶8 Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. DOR v. River City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550082 - 2022-08-02