Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18571 - 18580 of 29713 for des.

[PDF] Beverly Halverson v. PDQ Food Stores, Inc.
record, to which PDQ did not object, and we must conduct our de novo review based on the materials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14531 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Ameritech Advanced Data Services of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
). The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which generally we review de novo. American Family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12527 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
requirements is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶39. “[A] finding of fact is clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039997 - 2025-11-18

State v. Anthony John Doty
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7511 - 2005-03-31

State v. Virtis A.
at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6667 - 2005-03-31

Susan K. Schey v. Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation
. Summary judgment presents a question of law we review de novo. See id. at 497, 536 N.W.2d at 182. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14778 - 2005-03-31

Edison Liquor Corporation v. United Distillers & Vintners North America, Inc.
for rehearing), and must be material to the question of law presented, De Bonville v. Travelers Insurance Co., 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3035 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. Id., ¶15. ¶4 The double jeopardy provision protects against multiple punishments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41391 - 2009-09-29

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 15, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeal...
prejudiced the defendant are legal questions we decide de novo. See id. at 236-37. Deficient Performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82390 - 2012-05-14

Anthony R.V. v. Gerald P.C.
fact which we review de novo. See Lehr v. Robertson, 463 U.S. 248, 261 (1983); see also, State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14617 - 2005-03-31