Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18571 - 18580 of 49879 for our.
Search results 18571 - 18580 of 49879 for our.
State v. Kevin McCraney
the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction, we will not substitute our judgment for that of the trier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12134 - 2005-03-31
the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction, we will not substitute our judgment for that of the trier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12134 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
exercise our power of discretionary reversal in exceptional cases. Vollmer v. Luety, 156 Wis. 2d 1, 11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30222 - 2007-09-10
exercise our power of discretionary reversal in exceptional cases. Vollmer v. Luety, 156 Wis. 2d 1, 11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30222 - 2007-09-10
[PDF]
State v. Timothy L. Runke
an endless succession of postconviction remedies: We need finality in our litigation. Section 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21358 - 2017-09-21
an endless succession of postconviction remedies: We need finality in our litigation. Section 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21358 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497277 - 2022-03-22
a response to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497277 - 2022-03-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160869 - 2017-09-21
lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160869 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Brown County v. Grey C.B.
and interpretation is “to ascertain and give effect to the intent of the legislature,” and our first resort
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14248 - 2014-09-15
and interpretation is “to ascertain and give effect to the intent of the legislature,” and our first resort
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14248 - 2014-09-15
State v. Katrina D. Campbell
admission constituted harmless error. ¶9 In reviewing an evidentiary decision, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5696 - 2005-03-31
admission constituted harmless error. ¶9 In reviewing an evidentiary decision, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5696 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine our confidence in the outcome. Id. We may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79080 - 2012-03-05
. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine our confidence in the outcome. Id. We may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79080 - 2012-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
., 184 Wis. 2d at 600-01. The petition fails on both requirements. ¶6 Our supreme court addressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108947 - 2014-03-11
., 184 Wis. 2d at 600-01. The petition fails on both requirements. ¶6 Our supreme court addressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108947 - 2014-03-11
Manitowoc County v. Leesa J.Y.
between the parties. Second, Leesa raises a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Based on our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14347 - 2005-03-31
between the parties. Second, Leesa raises a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Based on our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14347 - 2005-03-31