Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18571 - 18580 of 50107 for our.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
did not think a field sobriety test “was … in our best interests for officer safety reasons.” ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102984 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Mitchel P.
other factors—personal accountability, the need for public protection, and rehabilitation. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19537 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal. 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156180 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Paul P.
to poll the jury. Indeed, we concluded our discussion of the issue by stating: "Jackson was represented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11018 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
prior conviction necessary for the circuit court to sentence him as a repeater. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=543063 - 2022-07-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
depositing a structure or material in the bed of a navigable waterway without a permit. Our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122262 - 2014-09-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Nothing in our independent review of the record would support a claim that trial counsel rendered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282416 - 2020-08-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
court erred by denying his pretrial motion to suppress evidence. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757351 - 2024-01-30

COURT OF APPEALS
to the party opposing the motion. Id., ¶23. Our task, then, is to determine whether the facts set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53999 - 2010-09-01

COURT OF APPEALS
Richardson’s original small claims action and the motion for relief from judgment. Because our decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60822 - 2011-03-08