Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18571 - 18580 of 61137 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] State v. Barry Howard
Walker, but claimed he acted in self-defense. The case was tried to a jury, which convicted him. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9583 - 2017-09-19

Duane Taylor v. St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin
, or even address, their motion to impose sanctions for frivolous claim pursuant to § 814.025, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14803 - 2005-03-31

Wm. R. Hubbell Steel Corporation v. Wisconsin Power and Light Company
not support the appellants' claim that the construction project was a public works project. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7981 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Wm. R. Hubbell Steel Corporation v. Wisconsin Power and Light Company
that the summary judgment record does not support the appellants' claim that the construction project
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7981 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Victor K. Johnson
motion for a mistrial. Johnson claims that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5793 - 2017-09-19

State v. Lindell Joe
that complainant made which also showed her motive to fabricate and which could, he claims, only be appreciated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7895 - 2005-03-31

State v. Raymond D. Shaw
), and 939.05, Stats.[1] He claims the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11726 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Donnie Lee Lacy
. Lacy claims he was denied effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment of the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9808 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a small claims court bench trial. Hunt argues the court erred by failing to award him approximately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237883 - 2019-03-26

2010 WI APP 139
for a road by claiming that the proposed road is unsafe. Specifically, they contend that the DOT’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54202 - 2011-08-21