Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18581 - 18590 of 49879 for our.
Search results 18581 - 18590 of 49879 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
findings of fact and conclusions of No. 2022AP1024 2 law. Based on our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726647 - 2023-11-09
findings of fact and conclusions of No. 2022AP1024 2 law. Based on our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726647 - 2023-11-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
findings of fact and conclusions of No. 2022AP1024 2 law. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726647 - 2023-11-09
findings of fact and conclusions of No. 2022AP1024 2 law. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726647 - 2023-11-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
lacks arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214174 - 2018-06-11
lacks arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214174 - 2018-06-11
Albert L. Otto v. Nancy Kremer
additional reasons exist to support the court’s exercise of discretion). ¶11 Our supreme court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15883 - 2005-03-31
additional reasons exist to support the court’s exercise of discretion). ¶11 Our supreme court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15883 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire
). When reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2560 - 2017-09-19
). When reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2560 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his motion for resentencing. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252153 - 2020-01-07
denying his motion for resentencing. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252153 - 2020-01-07
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
failed to formally find a factual basis for his plea before proceeding to sentencing. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050945 - 2025-12-17
failed to formally find a factual basis for his plea before proceeding to sentencing. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050945 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218917 - 2018-09-11
to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218917 - 2018-09-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The test for prejudice is whether our confidence in the outcome is sufficiently undermined. Id. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32223 - 2014-09-15
. The test for prejudice is whether our confidence in the outcome is sufficiently undermined. Id. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32223 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
consecutive days in jail. For purposes of our analysis, we assume that this is a correct statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31684 - 2014-09-15
consecutive days in jail. For purposes of our analysis, we assume that this is a correct statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31684 - 2014-09-15