Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18591 - 18600 of 41708 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 18591 - 18600 of 41708 for jury duty/1000.
State v. Sebastian "Frank" Bustamante
., 1977,[1] after a jury trial. Bustamante argues the trial court improperly admitted other acts evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9616 - 2005-03-31
., 1977,[1] after a jury trial. Bustamante argues the trial court improperly admitted other acts evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9616 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
should be granted a new trial. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Shelton was convicted by a jury of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89343 - 2012-11-14
should be granted a new trial. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Shelton was convicted by a jury of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89343 - 2012-11-14
[PDF]
State v. Sebastian Frank Bustamante
for second-degree murder of his son, Jason, contrary to § 940.02(1), STATS., 1977,1 after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9616 - 2017-09-19
for second-degree murder of his son, Jason, contrary to § 940.02(1), STATS., 1977,1 after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9616 - 2017-09-19
2007 WI APP 152
of Christina’s expert economist and for a remittitur or new trial following the jury verdict. American Family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29238 - 2007-06-26
of Christina’s expert economist and for a remittitur or new trial following the jury verdict. American Family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29238 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
be reached at a new trial, and that the real controversy was not fully tried because the jury did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35012 - 2014-09-15
be reached at a new trial, and that the real controversy was not fully tried because the jury did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35012 - 2014-09-15
Jane L. Trucksa v. Joseph B. Snyder
and argues: (1) there is a jury question as to whether Snyder’s negligence was a cause-in-fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10732 - 2005-03-31
and argues: (1) there is a jury question as to whether Snyder’s negligence was a cause-in-fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10732 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of conviction entered after a jury trial.1 He also appeals an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479163 - 2022-02-01
a judgment of conviction entered after a jury trial.1 He also appeals an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479163 - 2022-02-01
[PDF]
WI APP 152
or new trial following the jury verdict. American Family argues that Christina’s expert’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29238 - 2014-09-15
or new trial following the jury verdict. American Family argues that Christina’s expert’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29238 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a jury trial, of one count of second-degree reckless homicide. Stynes also appeals the order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446743 - 2021-11-03
a jury trial, of one count of second-degree reckless homicide. Stynes also appeals the order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446743 - 2021-11-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Before Fine, Curley and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. A jury found Randy Jeffery Hoeft guilty of one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28145 - 2014-09-15
. Before Fine, Curley and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. A jury found Randy Jeffery Hoeft guilty of one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28145 - 2014-09-15