Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1861 - 1870 of 29817 for des.
Search results 1861 - 1870 of 29817 for des.
[PDF]
Dale Vercauteren v. County of Oconto
De Pere, WI 54115-5637 Donald L. Romundson Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. P.O. Box 13067 Green Bay
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2906 - 2017-09-19
De Pere, WI 54115-5637 Donald L. Romundson Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. P.O. Box 13067 Green Bay
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2906 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
To: Hon. John A. Des Jardins Circuit Court Judge Outagamie County Courthouse 320 S. Walnut Street
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174673 - 2017-09-21
To: Hon. John A. Des Jardins Circuit Court Judge Outagamie County Courthouse 320 S. Walnut Street
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174673 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2006AP1085 Cir. Ct. No. 2004FA19
. Robert De Chambeau Circuit Court Judge Dane County Courthouse 215 South Hamilton, Br 1, Rm 4109
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30016 - 2014-09-15
. Robert De Chambeau Circuit Court Judge Dane County Courthouse 215 South Hamilton, Br 1, Rm 4109
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30016 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
21A471
; see also Johnson v. De Grandy, 512 U. S. 997, 1011–1012 (1994) (satisfying the Gingles preconditions
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/21a471_additionalauthority.pdf - 2022-03-23
; see also Johnson v. De Grandy, 512 U. S. 997, 1011–1012 (1994) (satisfying the Gingles preconditions
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/21a471_additionalauthority.pdf - 2022-03-23
State v. Felipe M. Benitez
of law which we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711, 715 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7902 - 2005-03-31
of law which we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711, 715 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7902 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 28
or the prejudice prong is a question of law that this court also reviews de novo. See id. ¶14 Where, as here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162821 - 2017-09-21
or the prejudice prong is a question of law that this court also reviews de novo. See id. ¶14 Where, as here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162821 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Appeals Unit Department of Justice P.O. Box 7857 Madison, WI 53707-7857 Marcella De Peters Law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191002 - 2017-09-21
Appeals Unit Department of Justice P.O. Box 7857 Madison, WI 53707-7857 Marcella De Peters Law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191002 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eduardo Alicea
omitted). Whether the State has met this high burden is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4907 - 2005-03-31
omitted). Whether the State has met this high burden is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4907 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the uncharged, read-in offenses might have on his sentence. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58772 - 2011-01-10
that the uncharged, read-in offenses might have on his sentence. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58772 - 2011-01-10
[PDF]
State v. James P. Henderson
, however, we review the postconviction court’s findings of fact de novo. State v. Herfel, 49 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2249 - 2017-09-19
, however, we review the postconviction court’s findings of fact de novo. State v. Herfel, 49 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2249 - 2017-09-19