Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1861 - 1870 of 64415 for records/1000.

State v. Charles J. Benoit
following voir dire and because he did not supplement the trial record with additional news reports linking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14079 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sought $8500 in attorney’s fees to counsel for the estate and a $1000 personal representative fee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249483 - 2019-11-05

Sterlingworth Condominium Association, Inc. v. State
is supported by substantial evidence in the record; and that the permit condition is reasonable. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10137 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Sterlingworth Condominium Association, Inc. v. State
; that the permit is supported by substantial evidence in the record; and that the permit condition is reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10137 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI 51
in lieu of conducting an evidentiary hearing. Having independently reviewed the record, we adopt those
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82781 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Paul D. Nelsen v. Susan Nelsen Candee
-3- guidelines. The financial disclosure records from February 1990 list his gross monthly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9498 - 2017-09-19

Paul D. Nelsen v. Susan Nelsen Candee
for a higher child support award under the guidelines. The financial disclosure records from February 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9498 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
) $990.59 in interest on a home equity loan that Meganck took out to buy the Yukon for Karius; (4) $1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69369 - 2011-08-08

Fredric P. Spindler v. Bonita B. Spindler
appeals. Our examination of the record satisfies us that the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10451 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Fredric P. Spindler v. Bonita B. Spindler
examination of the record satisfies us that the trial court’s determination on this question is not a misuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10451 - 2017-09-20