Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1861 - 1870 of 20929 for word.

[PDF] WI 72
that technical or specially-defined words or phrases are given their technical or special definitional meaning
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33225 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
not define "locating" or "reproduction." These words are not technical or specialized words. "Locating
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84155 - 2012-06-26

Frontsheet
, except that technical or specially-defined words or phrases are given their technical or special
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33225 - 2008-06-25

[PDF] WI App 68
, and accepted meaning, but technical words and phrases and those with a particular meaning in the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223991 - 2019-02-06

[PDF] WI 65
indicated. 2 The word "authority" is defined in Wis. Stat. § 19.32(1) as follows: No. 2011AP1112
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84155 - 2014-09-15

State v. Vance Ferron
their own assessments of a prospective juror's impartiality must do so from the cold, typewritten words
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17190 - 2005-03-31

Stephen Einhorn v. James D. Culea
than on extraneous considerations or influences. In other words, the test is whether a member
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17332 - 2008-07-29

[PDF] Stephen Einhorn v. James D. Culea
on the merits of the issue rather than on extraneous considerations or influences. In other words, the test
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17332 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Ta'shonia B.
was 1 The word “it” in the phrase “he thought it would be in her best interest” appears to refer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14889 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
ambiguous and that each party’s interpretation of them was reasonable. It explained that the word “may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135617 - 2017-09-21