Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18611 - 18620 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18611 - 18620 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
WI App 13
are presented with a question of law, which we review de novo. Loomis v. Wisconsin Pers. Comm’n, 179 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31131 - 2014-09-15
are presented with a question of law, which we review de novo. Loomis v. Wisconsin Pers. Comm’n, 179 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31131 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
facts constitute reasonable suspicion, however, is a question of law we review de novo. See id. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46270 - 2010-01-26
facts constitute reasonable suspicion, however, is a question of law we review de novo. See id. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46270 - 2010-01-26
Michael F. Hupy & Associates v. Michael T. Savaglio
, including the determination of whether their terms are ambiguous, are legal matters that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5002 - 2005-03-31
, including the determination of whether their terms are ambiguous, are legal matters that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5002 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
deference to the trial court’s conclusion. Id. Despite our de novo standard of review, we value the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63029 - 2011-04-26
deference to the trial court’s conclusion. Id. Despite our de novo standard of review, we value the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63029 - 2011-04-26
COURT OF APPEALS
). The ultimate conclusion of whether the change is substantial is a question of law that we determine de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133045 - 2015-01-20
). The ultimate conclusion of whether the change is substantial is a question of law that we determine de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133045 - 2015-01-20
[PDF]
Shirley Gorchals v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
of a statute, is a question of law we review de novo. See State ex rel. Grant v. Department of Corrections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13547 - 2017-09-21
of a statute, is a question of law we review de novo. See State ex rel. Grant v. Department of Corrections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13547 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Fischer, 2010 WI 6, ¶15, 322 Wis. 2d 265, 778 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95705 - 2014-09-15
a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Fischer, 2010 WI 6, ¶15, 322 Wis. 2d 265, 778 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95705 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Claus Bruestle
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Baratka, 2002 WI App 288, ¶7, 258 Wis. 2d 342, 654 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7455 - 2017-09-20
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Baratka, 2002 WI App 288, ¶7, 258 Wis. 2d 342, 654 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7455 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo a grant of summary judgment, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88606 - 2012-10-29
reviews de novo a grant of summary judgment, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88606 - 2012-10-29
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo. K.N.K. v. Buhler, 139 Wis. 2d 190, 198, 407 N.W.2d 281 (Ct. App. 1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119266 - 2014-08-12
of law we review de novo. K.N.K. v. Buhler, 139 Wis. 2d 190, 198, 407 N.W.2d 281 (Ct. App. 1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119266 - 2014-08-12