Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18611 - 18620 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18611 - 18620 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo, whether and to what degree a sentence should be modified is a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123107 - 2014-10-07
of law we review de novo, whether and to what degree a sentence should be modified is a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123107 - 2014-10-07
Loss Prevention Systems v. Alpha Omega Security, Inc.
met. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13268 - 2005-03-31
met. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13268 - 2005-03-31
State v. Outagamie County Board of Adjustment
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: john a. des jardins, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13879 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: john a. des jardins, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13879 - 2005-03-31
David J. Hoffman v. J. Daniel Benson
& Cas. 127 Wis.2d 298, 301, 380 N.W.2d 372, 373 (Ct. App. 1985). We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10277 - 2005-03-31
& Cas. 127 Wis.2d 298, 301, 380 N.W.2d 372, 373 (Ct. App. 1985). We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10277 - 2005-03-31
Acute Care Associates v. Trinity Memorial Hospital of Cudahy, Inc.
review is de novo. See id. We will affirm the summary judgment only if “there is no genuine issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12886 - 2005-03-31
review is de novo. See id. We will affirm the summary judgment only if “there is no genuine issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12886 - 2005-03-31
Christopher J. Keller v. James R. Kraft
to suits between co-employees. Accordingly, our review is de novo. See Stephenson v. Universal Metrics
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5995 - 2005-03-31
to suits between co-employees. Accordingly, our review is de novo. See Stephenson v. Universal Metrics
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5995 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
requiring us to de novo consider the meaning and application of the language in § 23.33. See Garcia v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=900801 - 2025-01-14
requiring us to de novo consider the meaning and application of the language in § 23.33. See Garcia v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=900801 - 2025-01-14
John Doe 67A v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee
is whether the “discovery rule” applies. The trial court held that it did not. On our de novo review, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6526 - 2005-03-31
is whether the “discovery rule” applies. The trial court held that it did not. On our de novo review, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6526 - 2005-03-31
State v. John R. Stambaugh
., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Beiersdorf, 208 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11922 - 2005-03-31
., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Beiersdorf, 208 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11922 - 2005-03-31
Firstar Bank of Milwaukee, N.A. v. Carl W. Berntsen
methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment was appropriate. See Coopman v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13730 - 2005-03-31
methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment was appropriate. See Coopman v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13730 - 2005-03-31