Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18611 - 18620 of 29942 for des.
Search results 18611 - 18620 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, are questions of law that we review de novo. Tammy W-G. v. Jacob T., 2011 WI 30, ¶¶16-17, 333 Wis. 2d 273
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218914 - 2018-09-18
, are questions of law that we review de novo. Tammy W-G. v. Jacob T., 2011 WI 30, ¶¶16-17, 333 Wis. 2d 273
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218914 - 2018-09-18
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Lee Davis
. ¶9 The interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. DOR v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2445 - 2017-09-19
. ¶9 The interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. DOR v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2445 - 2017-09-19
State v. Chris Lamar Crittendon
of law that we review de novo.” Id. “However, if the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7228 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo.” Id. “However, if the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7228 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See Williams v. American Transm. Co., 2007 WI App 246, ¶5, 306 Wis. 2d 181, 742 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41821 - 2009-10-05
review de novo. See Williams v. American Transm. Co., 2007 WI App 246, ¶5, 306 Wis. 2d 181, 742 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41821 - 2009-10-05
State v. Michael D. Sykes
and then review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts. Id. ¶17 However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6460 - 2005-03-31
and then review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts. Id. ¶17 However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6460 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 704.27 counterclaim. “‘The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142162 - 2015-05-20
. Stat. § 704.27 counterclaim. “‘The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142162 - 2015-05-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo the circuit court’s decision that a refusal to take a chemical test was improper. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311615 - 2020-12-09
de novo the circuit court’s decision that a refusal to take a chemical test was improper. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311615 - 2020-12-09
[PDF]
Anton F. Schorsch v. James Blader
(Ct. App. 1996). We will likewise determine questions of statutory construction de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10752 - 2017-09-20
(Ct. App. 1996). We will likewise determine questions of statutory construction de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10752 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
consent law, WIS. STAT. § 343.305, is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. State v. Baratka
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62519 - 2014-09-15
consent law, WIS. STAT. § 343.305, is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. State v. Baratka
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62519 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
concluded that the absence of a cover page on Wartman’s proposal was de minimus and remediable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32921 - 2014-09-15
concluded that the absence of a cover page on Wartman’s proposal was de minimus and remediable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32921 - 2014-09-15