Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18611 - 18620 of 65155 for or b.
Search results 18611 - 18620 of 65155 for or b.
COURT OF APPEALS
: Allan b. torhorst, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1] The State appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36807 - 2009-06-16
: Allan b. torhorst, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1] The State appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36807 - 2009-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
County: JOHN B. MURPHY, Reserve Judge, and terence t. bourke, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29039 - 2007-05-15
County: JOHN B. MURPHY, Reserve Judge, and terence t. bourke, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29039 - 2007-05-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentenced, if the convictions remain of record and unreversed[.]” WIS. STAT. § 939.621(1)(b
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026471 - 2025-10-21
sentenced, if the convictions remain of record and unreversed[.]” WIS. STAT. § 939.621(1)(b
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026471 - 2025-10-21
Jennifer A. Croop v. Tom A. Sweeney
a continuity of purpose.” Section 947.013(1)(a) and (1m)(b). Single, isolated acts do not constitute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15289 - 2005-03-31
a continuity of purpose.” Section 947.013(1)(a) and (1m)(b). Single, isolated acts do not constitute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15289 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel N.P.
is a jurisdictional prerequisite. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.10(1)(b). ¶11 In addition, Patricia did not raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16181 - 2017-09-21
is a jurisdictional prerequisite. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.10(1)(b). ¶11 In addition, Patricia did not raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16181 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel N.P.
is a jurisdictional prerequisite. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.10(1)(b). ¶11 In addition, Patricia did not raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16180 - 2017-09-21
is a jurisdictional prerequisite. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.10(1)(b). ¶11 In addition, Patricia did not raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16180 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
) in violation of WIS. STAT. § 346.65(2)(b)2., fourth offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29179 - 2014-09-15
) in violation of WIS. STAT. § 346.65(2)(b)2., fourth offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29179 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
with other traffic or to comply with traffic regulations. Subsecs. 346.50(1)(a) and (b). ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29301 - 2014-09-15
with other traffic or to comply with traffic regulations. Subsecs. 346.50(1)(a) and (b). ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29301 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jacob W. Hatcher
and 125.07(4)(b). No. 02-2687-CR 5 ¶13 Hatcher claims that Fitzgerald had no reason to suspect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5746 - 2017-09-19
and 125.07(4)(b). No. 02-2687-CR 5 ¶13 Hatcher claims that Fitzgerald had no reason to suspect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5746 - 2017-09-19
Frontsheet
in other respects, in violation of SCR 20:8.4(b).[2] ¶10 In the stipulation Attorney Compton verifies
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54224 - 2010-09-07
in other respects, in violation of SCR 20:8.4(b).[2] ¶10 In the stipulation Attorney Compton verifies
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54224 - 2010-09-07