Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18611 - 18620 of 83259 for simple case search/1000.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
acted with intent to become sexually aroused or gratified. Id. For purposes of this case, the jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101375 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
credibility. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case involved the repeated sexual assault of T.S. that began
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149388 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, and to dispute the constitutionality of any police action in the case. The trial court told Harris
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174282 - 2017-09-21

Monroe County Department of Human Services v. Maureen J.
] because the issue in this case is neglect. Maureen also requested to invoke the privilege when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12678 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2018CF1340. Three months later, Minor, his father, and another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713814 - 2023-10-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for the death of his mother, Sally Pergolski. In broad terms, the State’s theory of the case was that Boruch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261245 - 2020-07-22

State v. Scott K. Seal
, in the case of a prison, shall be imprisoned for not more than 3 years or fined not more than $500. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5270 - 2005-03-31

WI App 29 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP453-CR Complete Title ...
retail theft case, and—as the State correctly points out in its response brief—a search for Stanley K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108162 - 2014-03-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
A. Wagner presided over the trial and sentencing in this case. The Honorable David L. Borowski presided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656430 - 2023-05-16

[PDF] Monroe County Department of Human Services v. Maureen J.
., reads: (continued) No. 97-1850 4 because the issue in this case is neglect. Maureen also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12678 - 2017-09-21