Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18621 - 18630 of 29832 for des.
Search results 18621 - 18630 of 29832 for des.
State v. Virtis A.
at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6667 - 2005-03-31
at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6667 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
acted according to law is a question of law that is reviewed de novo.” Tate, 246 Wis. 2d 293, ¶10. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34541 - 2008-11-11
acted according to law is a question of law that is reviewed de novo.” Tate, 246 Wis. 2d 293, ¶10. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34541 - 2008-11-11
L. W. Meyer, Inc. v. Robert Koeferl
which this court reviews de novo. Kaun v. Indus. Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 148 Wis. 2d 662, 667, 436 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4693 - 2009-06-18
which this court reviews de novo. Kaun v. Indus. Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 148 Wis. 2d 662, 667, 436 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4693 - 2009-06-18
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 179, 709 N.W.2d 893. ¶12 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85767 - 2014-09-29
review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 179, 709 N.W.2d 893. ¶12 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85767 - 2014-09-29
COURT OF APPEALS
facts constitute reasonable suspicion, however, is a question of law we review de novo. See id. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46270 - 2010-01-26
facts constitute reasonable suspicion, however, is a question of law we review de novo. See id. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46270 - 2010-01-26
COURT OF APPEALS
, 676, 747 N.W.2d 673, 678. We consider questions of law de novo. State v. Ploeckelman, 2007 WI App 31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34675 - 2008-11-24
, 676, 747 N.W.2d 673, 678. We consider questions of law de novo. State v. Ploeckelman, 2007 WI App 31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34675 - 2008-11-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but “we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846984 - 2024-09-10
fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but “we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846984 - 2024-09-10
[PDF]
James J. Kaufman v. Judy P. Smith
(2). Our review of the dismissal is de novo. See State ex rel. Johnson v. Litscher, 2001 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5120 - 2017-09-19
(2). Our review of the dismissal is de novo. See State ex rel. Johnson v. Litscher, 2001 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5120 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
then “review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Eason, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210432 - 2018-04-03
then “review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Eason, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210432 - 2018-04-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. Brown, 276 Wis. 2d 559, ¶5. ¶8 We begin our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36099 - 2014-09-15
is a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. Brown, 276 Wis. 2d 559, ¶5. ¶8 We begin our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36099 - 2014-09-15