Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18621 - 18630 of 29832 for des.
Search results 18621 - 18630 of 29832 for des.
[PDF]
WI APP 70
review de novo. See Magyar v. Wisconsin Health Care Liab. Ins. Plan, 2001 WI 41, ¶8, 242 Wis. 2d 491
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62662 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. See Magyar v. Wisconsin Health Care Liab. Ins. Plan, 2001 WI 41, ¶8, 242 Wis. 2d 491
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62662 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Edwin Gratz v. James L. Gratz
judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed by the trial court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10804 - 2017-09-20
judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed by the trial court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10804 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Larry Gates v. Michael Dorshorst
meetings law statutes to a set of undisputed facts de novo. State ex rel. Badke v. Greendale Village Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5925 - 2017-09-19
meetings law statutes to a set of undisputed facts de novo. State ex rel. Badke v. Greendale Village Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5925 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2021AP1215-CR 2021AP1216-CR 5 de novo, without deference to the circuit court, but benefitting from its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594255 - 2022-11-30
2021AP1215-CR 2021AP1216-CR 5 de novo, without deference to the circuit court, but benefitting from its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594255 - 2022-11-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
without deference to the trial court’s conclusion. Id. Despite our de novo standard of review, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63029 - 2014-09-15
without deference to the trial court’s conclusion. Id. Despite our de novo standard of review, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63029 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Sarnowski, Jr.
). Whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10478 - 2017-09-20
). Whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10478 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional principles to those facts is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id.; State v. Verhagen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585401 - 2022-11-09
of constitutional principles to those facts is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id.; State v. Verhagen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585401 - 2022-11-09
[PDF]
Ann Lee Bogan v. Price County
to grant summary judgment presents a question of law that we review de novo. Ottinger v. Pinel, 215 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13625 - 2017-09-21
to grant summary judgment presents a question of law that we review de novo. Ottinger v. Pinel, 215 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13625 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lamardus D. Ford
it passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law subject to de novo review.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11512 - 2017-09-19
it passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law subject to de novo review.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11512 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 258
that duty. Our standard for reviewing interpretations of contractual provisions is de novo, see Everson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27172 - 2014-09-15
that duty. Our standard for reviewing interpretations of contractual provisions is de novo, see Everson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27172 - 2014-09-15