Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18621 - 18630 of 58285 for speedy trial.

City of Stevens Point v. Michael C. Wirtz
on appeal that the trial court erred in refusing to grant his motion for a mistrial after the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3844 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial. The issue is whether postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32889 - 2008-06-02

[PDF] Lorraine K. Kerbell (now Ruth) v. Robert A. Kerbell
that Wisconsin exercise its jurisdiction; (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11453 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of postconviction counsel because that counsel did not raise ineffective assistance of trial counsel issues. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138975 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Gerald O. v. Cindy R.
to terminate his parental rights to his son, Michael I.O. Cindy and the State contend that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10626 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to personally appear at his forfeiture court trial. Buntrock, who appeared at trial by his attorney, argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89101 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Christopher McSwain
. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Schudson, JJ. PER CURIAM. Following a four-day jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9728 - 2017-09-19

Lorraine K. Kerbell (now Ruth) v. Robert A. Kerbell
. Kerbell argues that (1) federal law mandates that Wisconsin exercise its jurisdiction; (2) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11453 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Nancy M. Keller v. Michael J. Keller, Sr.
the stipulation to the family court for approval. On January 19, 1996, the trial court entered an order stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11564 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Gary L. Kluck
. Because we disagree with the trial court's conclusion that the law prohibits it from reduction of a jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9518 - 2017-09-19