Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18631 - 18640 of 30164 for de.
Search results 18631 - 18640 of 30164 for de.
Frontsheet
of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144564 - 2015-07-14
of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144564 - 2015-07-14
CA Blank Order
constitutes a new factor is a question of law, subject to de novo review. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1, 8
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98879 - 2013-07-02
constitutes a new factor is a question of law, subject to de novo review. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1, 8
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98879 - 2013-07-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We uphold a circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, but decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997158 - 2025-08-20
. We uphold a circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, but decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997158 - 2025-08-20
City of Oshkosh v. Christine K. Palecek-Baerwald
constitutes probable cause is a question of law that the court of appeals will review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5908 - 2005-03-31
constitutes probable cause is a question of law that the court of appeals will review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5908 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eugene M. Brabender
probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9716 - 2005-03-31
probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9716 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jermaine V. Dantzler
, 53–54, 429 N.W.2d 110, 112–113 (Ct. App. 1988). This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4044 - 2005-03-31
, 53–54, 429 N.W.2d 110, 112–113 (Ct. App. 1988). This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4044 - 2005-03-31
State v. Keith M. Carey
of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI 77, ¶16, 253 Wis. 2d 449, 646 N.W.2d 341
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6583 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI 77, ¶16, 253 Wis. 2d 449, 646 N.W.2d 341
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6583 - 2005-03-31
State v. Keith M. Carey
of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI 77, ¶16, 253 Wis. 2d 449, 646 N.W.2d 341
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6582 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI 77, ¶16, 253 Wis. 2d 449, 646 N.W.2d 341
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6582 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jeffrey A. Kingsley
, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). The referee's conclusions of law, however, we review on a de novo basis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20924 - 2006-01-12
, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). The referee's conclusions of law, however, we review on a de novo basis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20924 - 2006-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Danbeck v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2001 WI 91, ¶10, 245 Wis. 2d 186, 629 N.W.2d 150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54005 - 2010-09-07
de novo. Danbeck v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2001 WI 91, ¶10, 245 Wis. 2d 186, 629 N.W.2d 150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54005 - 2010-09-07