Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18631 - 18640 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18631 - 18640 of 29823 for des.
State v. Chris Lamar Crittendon
of law that we review de novo.” Id. “However, if the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7228 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo.” Id. “However, if the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7228 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Cindy L. Grothe v. Valley Coatings, Inc.
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2306 - 2017-09-19
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2306 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Rick Montgomery v. Carl J. Mahler
the circumstances, and any error was de minimus. See Ziegler v. Wonn, 18 Wis.2d 382, 389, 118 N.W.2d 706, 710
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8957 - 2017-09-19
the circumstances, and any error was de minimus. See Ziegler v. Wonn, 18 Wis.2d 382, 389, 118 N.W.2d 706, 710
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8957 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
County of Dodge v. Michael J.K.
.) Interpretation and application of a statute are questions of law which we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11222 - 2017-09-19
.) Interpretation and application of a statute are questions of law which we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11222 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo.’” State v. Bailey, 2009 WI App 140, ¶14, 321 Wis. 2d 350, 773 N.W.2d 488 (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142162 - 2017-09-21
review de novo.’” State v. Bailey, 2009 WI App 140, ¶14, 321 Wis. 2d 350, 773 N.W.2d 488 (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142162 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 499, 643 N.W.2d 777. We review de novo whether the application of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168844 - 2017-09-21
Wis. 2d 499, 643 N.W.2d 777. We review de novo whether the application of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168844 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the property in 2009, such that he did not violate either ordinance. We review de novo the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213616 - 2018-05-30
of the property in 2009, such that he did not violate either ordinance. We review de novo the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213616 - 2018-05-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to our de novo review. See State v. Cockrell, 2007 WI App 217, ¶14, 306 Wis. 2d 52, 741 N.W.2d 267
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=514533 - 2022-04-26
to our de novo review. See State v. Cockrell, 2007 WI App 217, ¶14, 306 Wis. 2d 52, 741 N.W.2d 267
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=514533 - 2022-04-26
[PDF]
State v. Cleveland Brown, Jr.
a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10523 - 2017-09-20
a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10523 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Jimmy Lee Hensley
, reviewed de novo. Id. at 265, 407 N.W.2d at 312. If we conclude that Hensley's trial counsel rendered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9812 - 2017-09-19
, reviewed de novo. Id. at 265, 407 N.W.2d at 312. If we conclude that Hensley's trial counsel rendered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9812 - 2017-09-19