Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18641 - 18650 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18641 - 18650 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Amendment, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66793 - 2014-09-15
Amendment, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66793 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
raised a new issue “presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108145 - 2017-09-21
raised a new issue “presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108145 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determine de novo. Id. ¶12 The evidence showed Dietzen’s income had increased and that sixteen-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133045 - 2017-09-21
determine de novo. Id. ¶12 The evidence showed Dietzen’s income had increased and that sixteen-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133045 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶15 Contract interpretation presents a question of law subject to de novo review. Osborn v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111479 - 2017-09-21
. ¶15 Contract interpretation presents a question of law subject to de novo review. Osborn v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111479 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo the circuit court’s decision that a refusal to take a chemical test was improper. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311615 - 2020-12-09
de novo the circuit court’s decision that a refusal to take a chemical test was improper. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311615 - 2020-12-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo.’” State v. Bailey, 2009 WI App 140, ¶14, 321 Wis. 2d 350, 773 N.W.2d 488 (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142162 - 2017-09-21
review de novo.’” State v. Bailey, 2009 WI App 140, ¶14, 321 Wis. 2d 350, 773 N.W.2d 488 (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142162 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Johnny M. McAdoo
de novo. State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis. 2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656 (1976). The trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4343 - 2017-09-19
de novo. State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis. 2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656 (1976). The trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4343 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s decision as to whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95661 - 2014-09-15
court’s decision as to whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95661 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
process is a constitutional issue we decide de novo. State v. Travis, 2013 WI 38, ¶20, 347 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113388 - 2017-09-21
process is a constitutional issue we decide de novo. State v. Travis, 2013 WI 38, ¶20, 347 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113388 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1980). “Whether a party has met its burden of proof is a question of law” reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792650 - 2024-04-25
(1980). “Whether a party has met its burden of proof is a question of law” reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792650 - 2024-04-25