Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18651 - 18660 of 68485 for did.
Search results 18651 - 18660 of 68485 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
postconviction motion to withdraw his no contest plea to kidnapping. Stevenson did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36403 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion to withdraw his no contest plea to kidnapping. Stevenson did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36403 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for appeal. It is arguable that during the plea colloquy, the circuit court did not discharge its duties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173733 - 2017-09-21
for appeal. It is arguable that during the plea colloquy, the circuit court did not discharge its duties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173733 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lance L. Egner
the Blockburger test, there is a presumption that the legislature did not intend multiple punishments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7154 - 2017-09-20
the Blockburger test, there is a presumption that the legislature did not intend multiple punishments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7154 - 2017-09-20
State v. Peter C. Ramuta
and understood the plea questionnaire form, and he said he did. The court then asked: “Mr. Ramuta, do you also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5603 - 2005-03-31
and understood the plea questionnaire form, and he said he did. The court then asked: “Mr. Ramuta, do you also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5603 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Dirkes
from Block did not tend to show, by itself, that Larry Olson disclaimed a drug transaction with Dirkes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9169 - 2005-03-31
from Block did not tend to show, by itself, that Larry Olson disclaimed a drug transaction with Dirkes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9169 - 2005-03-31
State v. William F.S.
objection or claim of prejudice, the trial court properly allowed the motion. While the motion did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14548 - 2005-03-31
objection or claim of prejudice, the trial court properly allowed the motion. While the motion did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14548 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dale Robert Wiegert
was a Riverside violation, the law is clear that, contrary to Wiegert's argument, the trial court did not thereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8959 - 2005-03-31
was a Riverside violation, the law is clear that, contrary to Wiegert's argument, the trial court did not thereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8959 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, the circuit court did not specifically inform Parker of the maximum potential penalty. However, that provides
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140294 - 2015-04-02
, the circuit court did not specifically inform Parker of the maximum potential penalty. However, that provides
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140294 - 2015-04-02
COURT OF APPEALS
plea. He contends he was confused about the nature of the charge and the court did not engage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86725 - 2013-10-02
plea. He contends he was confused about the nature of the charge and the court did not engage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86725 - 2013-10-02
Jevic Enterprises, Inc. v. Arlo E. Schultz
, and Loran told Weber that the Schultzes did not plan to live in a mobile home. According to her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3927 - 2005-03-31
, and Loran told Weber that the Schultzes did not plan to live in a mobile home. According to her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3927 - 2005-03-31