Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18651 - 18660 of 58303 for speedy trial.

The Estate of Richmond P. Izard v. Richmond P. Izard
and ordered closing the estate of Richmond P. Izard (Richmond I). Richmond II claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5905 - 2005-03-31

Waushara County v. Richard Mack
raises three issues on appeal: (1) "restraints" issued against Mack are unconstitutional; (2) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8019 - 2005-03-31

WI App 139 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2012AP236-CR 2012AP237-CR ...
because the trial court did not explain party to a crime liability during his plea hearing. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89425 - 2012-12-18

[PDF] WI App 139
the trial court did not explain party to a crime liability during his plea hearing. We disagree. Party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89425 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
arising from a fire at a residence owned by Hisle in a rural area in Ohio. The trial court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28390 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
. See Wis. Stat. § 48.415(2), (6). After a jury trial, the jury agreed that the State had proved both
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123240 - 2014-10-07

[PDF] Julie A. Williams v. Paul Nelson
.1 Williams contends that the trial court erred by concluding that there were no disputed issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13557 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. A motion to withdraw a plea is addressed to the trial court’s discretion and we will reverse only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32995 - 2008-06-17

Eddie D. Cannon v. State
the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in dismissing his petition for return of property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11109 - 2005-03-31

Sanfelippo Environmental Construction, LLC v. Mews Companies, Inc.
and attorneys’ fees. The appellants contend that the trial court: (1) erred in determining that Sanfelippo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14586 - 2005-03-31