Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18661 - 18670 of 30165 for de.
Search results 18661 - 18670 of 30165 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, 317 Wis. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. “[W]e review de novo the ultimate question whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863769 - 2024-10-23
, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, 317 Wis. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. “[W]e review de novo the ultimate question whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863769 - 2024-10-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determine de novo. Id. ¶12 The evidence showed Dietzen’s income had increased and that sixteen-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133045 - 2017-09-21
determine de novo. Id. ¶12 The evidence showed Dietzen’s income had increased and that sixteen-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133045 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” State v. Phillips, 2009 WI App 179, ¶17, 322 Wis. 2d 576, 778 N.W.2d 157. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261624 - 2020-05-27
.” State v. Phillips, 2009 WI App 179, ¶17, 322 Wis. 2d 576, 778 N.W.2d 157. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261624 - 2020-05-27
[PDF]
WI 26
findings of fact unless they are found to be clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35941 - 2014-09-15
findings of fact unless they are found to be clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35941 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 53
). The interpretation of statutes is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36010 - 2014-09-15
). The interpretation of statutes is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36010 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13176 - 2017-09-21
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13176 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo the circuit court’s decision that a refusal to take a chemical test was improper. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311615 - 2020-12-09
de novo the circuit court’s decision that a refusal to take a chemical test was improper. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311615 - 2020-12-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34875 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34875 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Float-Rite Park, Inc. v. Village of Somerset
to the constitutionality of § 11.09(4) presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Urmanski v. Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2699 - 2017-09-19
to the constitutionality of § 11.09(4) presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Urmanski v. Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2699 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. Id. As a general rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85239 - 2014-09-15
review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. Id. As a general rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85239 - 2014-09-15