Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18661 - 18670 of 29828 for des.
Search results 18661 - 18670 of 29828 for des.
[PDF]
Verlyn A. Schleusner v. William R. Lamb
review de novo. Zintek v. Perchik, 163 Wis. 2d 439, 454, 471 N.W.2d 522 (Ct. App. 1991), overruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2667 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. Zintek v. Perchik, 163 Wis. 2d 439, 454, 471 N.W.2d 522 (Ct. App. 1991), overruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2667 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mark R. Anderson
, which we review de novo. State v. Daggett, 2002 WI App 32, ¶7, 250 Wis. 2d 112, 640 N.W.2d 546
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20383 - 2017-09-21
, which we review de novo. State v. Daggett, 2002 WI App 32, ¶7, 250 Wis. 2d 112, 640 N.W.2d 546
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20383 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. The application of a statute to a particular set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88622 - 2012-10-24
. The application of a statute to a particular set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88622 - 2012-10-24
Ann Lee Bogan v. Price County
review de novo. Ottinger v. Pinel, 215 Wis.2d 265, 272, 572 N.W.2d 519, 521 (Ct. App. 1997). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13625 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Ottinger v. Pinel, 215 Wis.2d 265, 272, 572 N.W.2d 519, 521 (Ct. App. 1997). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13625 - 2005-03-31
State v. Johnny M. McAdoo
right to a speedy trial is a constitutional question, which we review de novo. State v. Ziegenhagen, 73
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4343 - 2005-03-31
right to a speedy trial is a constitutional question, which we review de novo. State v. Ziegenhagen, 73
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4343 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to our de novo review. See State v. Cooper, 2003 WI App 227, ¶9, 267 Wis. 2d 886, 672 N.W.2d 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265585 - 2020-06-25
to our de novo review. See State v. Cooper, 2003 WI App 227, ¶9, 267 Wis. 2d 886, 672 N.W.2d 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265585 - 2020-06-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
109. “Due process determinations are questions of law we decide de novo.” Waukesha County v. S.L.L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364961 - 2021-05-12
109. “Due process determinations are questions of law we decide de novo.” Waukesha County v. S.L.L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364961 - 2021-05-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195541 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195541 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Coopman v. State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30897 - 2007-11-20
a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Coopman v. State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30897 - 2007-11-20
State v. Ronald G. Fedler
by the circuit court is a question of law which we review de novo. Capoun Revocable Trust v. Ansari, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4448 - 2005-03-31
by the circuit court is a question of law which we review de novo. Capoun Revocable Trust v. Ansari, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4448 - 2005-03-31