Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18671 - 18680 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18671 - 18680 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We uphold a circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, but decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997158 - 2025-08-20
. We uphold a circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, but decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997158 - 2025-08-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.)). This is a question of law that we review de novo. Bell, 380 Wis. 2d 616, ¶8. We conclude that the introduction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771390 - 2024-03-05
.)). This is a question of law that we review de novo. Bell, 380 Wis. 2d 616, ¶8. We conclude that the introduction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771390 - 2024-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Lala, 2009 WI App 137, ¶8, 321 Wis. 2d 292, 773 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96858 - 2013-05-15
, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Lala, 2009 WI App 137, ¶8, 321 Wis. 2d 292, 773 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96858 - 2013-05-15
State v. Gary J. Hazen
of law which we review de novo. See State v. Anderson, 219 Wis. 2d 739, 746, 580 N.W.2d 329 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2770 - 2005-03-31
of law which we review de novo. See State v. Anderson, 219 Wis. 2d 739, 746, 580 N.W.2d 329 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2770 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Marks
to be free from double jeopardy is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Henning, 2004 WI 89
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6725 - 2005-03-31
to be free from double jeopardy is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Henning, 2004 WI 89
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6725 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 246
must interpret and apply Wis. Stat. § 893.28(2) to undisputed facts, a question of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30511 - 2007-11-27
must interpret and apply Wis. Stat. § 893.28(2) to undisputed facts, a question of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30511 - 2007-11-27
2009 WI APP 3
of law that we review de novo. Sands v. Whitnall Sch. Dist., 2008 WI 89, ¶14, __ Wis. 2d __, 754 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35069 - 2009-01-27
of law that we review de novo. Sands v. Whitnall Sch. Dist., 2008 WI 89, ¶14, __ Wis. 2d __, 754 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35069 - 2009-01-27
James L. Gratz v. Harold E. Gratz
. We review a decision to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10803 - 2005-03-31
. We review a decision to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10803 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, our review is de novo. Id., ¶39. 1 All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35714 - 2014-09-15
, our review is de novo. Id., ¶39. 1 All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35714 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
detention into a de facto arrest. Kurek had to physically restrain and handcuff McElwee to perform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29881 - 2014-09-15
detention into a de facto arrest. Kurek had to physically restrain and handcuff McElwee to perform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29881 - 2014-09-15