Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18671 - 18680 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 18671 - 18680 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Patrick T. Glover
(OWI). He challenges the trial court’s ruling that the arresting officer possessed the reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20709 - 2017-09-21
(OWI). He challenges the trial court’s ruling that the arresting officer possessed the reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20709 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial. The issue is whether postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32889 - 2008-06-02
for a new trial. The issue is whether postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32889 - 2008-06-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that his two trial attorneys were ineffective by failing to present a consistent defense. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=306087 - 2020-11-19
argues that his two trial attorneys were ineffective by failing to present a consistent defense. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=306087 - 2020-11-19
[PDF]
Daniel K. T., Jr. v. Sara K. L.
., appeals an order granting Sara K.L.’s motion for summary judgment. He contends the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13873 - 2014-09-15
., appeals an order granting Sara K.L.’s motion for summary judgment. He contends the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13873 - 2014-09-15
County of Waushara v. Richard Mack
raises three issues on appeal: (1) "restraints" issued against Mack are unconstitutional; (2) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8051 - 2005-03-31
raises three issues on appeal: (1) "restraints" issued against Mack are unconstitutional; (2) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8051 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
for a new trial. The issue is whether postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32889 - 2014-09-15
for a new trial. The issue is whether postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32889 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robin Jean Sanders
. No. 04-1129-CR 2 violation of WIS. STAT. § 961.41(3g)(c) (2001-02). 3 She contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7480 - 2017-09-20
. No. 04-1129-CR 2 violation of WIS. STAT. § 961.41(3g)(c) (2001-02). 3 She contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7480 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals the order denying his postconviction motion, in which he alleged that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773649 - 2024-03-12
appeals the order denying his postconviction motion, in which he alleged that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773649 - 2024-03-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel for not pursuing a claim of ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194442 - 2017-09-21
the ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel for not pursuing a claim of ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194442 - 2017-09-21
Joan M. Kudlick v. James E. Bivens
(collectively, the Lallys). The Bivenses argue the trial court erred because (1) the Lallys failed to give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7359 - 2005-03-31
(collectively, the Lallys). The Bivenses argue the trial court erred because (1) the Lallys failed to give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7359 - 2005-03-31