Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18671 - 18680 of 58285 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS
from a trial court judgment in favor of the City of Brookfield. The City condemned portions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50755 - 2010-06-08

[PDF] State v. Patrick T. Glover
(OWI). He challenges the trial court’s ruling that the arresting officer possessed the reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20709 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
prosecutions were handled together in the trial court and all filings include both lower court case numbers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32995 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
estimation, Strauss would have had to come onto her property to take the picture. ¶8 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965319 - 2025-06-04

[PDF] Waushara County v. Richard Mack
issues on appeal: (1) "restraints" issued against Mack are unconstitutional; (2) the trial court lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8019 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Robin Jean Sanders
. No. 04-1129-CR 2 violation of WIS. STAT. § 961.41(3g)(c) (2001-02). 3 She contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7480 - 2017-09-20

Kathleen Hermanson v. Wal Mart Stores, Inc.
. The trial court determined that the proposed class should not be certified under Wis. Stat. Rule 803.08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21467 - 2006-03-22

WI App 139 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2012AP236-CR 2012AP237-CR ...
because the trial court did not explain party to a crime liability during his plea hearing. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89425 - 2012-12-18

[PDF] WI App 139
the trial court did not explain party to a crime liability during his plea hearing. We disagree. Party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89425 - 2014-09-15

Waushara County v. Richard Mack
raises three issues on appeal: (1) "restraints" issued against Mack are unconstitutional; (2) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8019 - 2005-03-31