Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18681 - 18690 of 29662 for name.
Search results 18681 - 18690 of 29662 for name.
COURT OF APPEALS
testified: “[A] number of the files, when we opened them, had names of like very young females
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93766 - 2013-03-06
testified: “[A] number of the files, when we opened them, had names of like very young females
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93766 - 2013-03-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The plaintiff in this foreclosure action, and thus the named respondent on appeal, is “Bank of New York
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104326 - 2017-09-21
The plaintiff in this foreclosure action, and thus the named respondent on appeal, is “Bank of New York
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104326 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John R. Jagusch
, Jagusch told him he wanted "to find somebody to have a couple people taken care of," namely, a pilot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11783 - 2017-09-20
, Jagusch told him he wanted "to find somebody to have a couple people taken care of," namely, a pilot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11783 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to preserve “the most significant and obvious defect in the plea colloquy”—namely, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128640 - 2017-09-21
motion to preserve “the most significant and obvious defect in the plea colloquy”—namely, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128640 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the dismissed and read-in charges given the “contravening considerations”; namely, his lack of a prior record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878389 - 2024-11-19
to the dismissed and read-in charges given the “contravening considerations”; namely, his lack of a prior record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878389 - 2024-11-19
Tony A. Henderson v. Milwaukee County
of APPEAL Appeal from an order Full Name JUDGE COURT: Circuit Lower Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9548 - 2005-03-31
of APPEAL Appeal from an order Full Name JUDGE COURT: Circuit Lower Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9548 - 2005-03-31
State v. Larry B. Hooker
that the trial court failed to account for the “mitigating circumstances,” namely that he maintained his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6494 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court failed to account for the “mitigating circumstances,” namely that he maintained his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6494 - 2005-03-31
Joann R. Alwin v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
that the statute’s common name is a misnomer, as liability is not dependent on a dog bite. We will therefore refer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15787 - 2005-03-31
that the statute’s common name is a misnomer, as liability is not dependent on a dog bite. We will therefore refer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15787 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Robert’s use of the land while it was titled in his parents’ names was permissive, not adverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90891 - 2014-09-15
that Robert’s use of the land while it was titled in his parents’ names was permissive, not adverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90891 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affidavit, a Milwaukee police officer was contacted by a source with information about someone named “Tone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237466 - 2019-03-19
affidavit, a Milwaukee police officer was contacted by a source with information about someone named “Tone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237466 - 2019-03-19