Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1871 - 1880 of 15982 for WA 0852 2611 9277 Pemborong Interior Dinding Apartemen Margonda Residence Depok.

State v. David N. Burkhart
of his motion to suppress evidence seized in a search of his residence. Specifically, he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16264 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
no evidence that The Daily Reporter is circulated in South Milwaukee, which is where Mr. Svoboda resides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169343 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. David N. Burkhart
in a search of his residence. Specifically, he claims that (a) the testimony upon which the search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16264 - 2017-09-21

State v. Gordon Greer
was in custody for purposes of Miranda[1] when he was questioned by the police during a search of his residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9252 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the burglarized residence. When he encountered the men, Wolf was looking for “two male black individuals” who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98081 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. David W. Janke
to search the contents of a Federal Express package addressed to Janke’s residence. At the warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8748 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
to a residence at 4316 Woodcrest in Janesville to investigate a reported disturbance. One of the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33498 - 2008-07-23

State v. David W. Janke
the contents of a Federal Express package addressed to Janke’s residence. At the warrant application hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8748 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that a black male was selling “large amounts of marijuana out of the residence.” A woman, subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67144 - 2011-07-05

[PDF] Michael E. Stoetzel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
residence on a floodplain. For the reasons discussed below, we reverse the circuit court and reinstate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4911 - 2017-09-19