Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1871 - 1880 of 6245 for cf.

State v. Thomas E. Formaro
. Appeal No. 01-1849-CR Cir. Ct. No. 01-CF-153 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4164 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
undertake to meet that commitment. Cf. Margaret H., 234 Wis. 2d 606, ¶29 (“In its discretion, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179058 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Bernhardt C. Thompson
occurring in 95- CF-450? MR. THOMPSON: Yes, Your Honor. THE COURT: Is that correct? MR. THOMPSON: Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15440 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael Daniels
the granting of a mistrial. Cf. State v. Britt, 203 Wis.2d 25, 42, 553 N.W.2d 528, 535 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9988 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Vincent T. Preston v. Condon Construction and Realty, Inc.
of the express warranty. Cf. WIS. STAT. § 706.10(7) (providing an implied warranty that improvements to real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7223 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Elizabeth H. v. Malcolm H.
expression. Cf. Lange v. Lange, 175 Wis.2d 373, 382, 502 N.W.2d 143, 147 (Ct. App. 1993), cert. denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11377 - 2017-09-19

State v. Eric T. Scott
of that credit were used toward a sentence of time served for circuit court case no. 00-CF-55, along with what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17892 - 2005-05-02

State v. Christopher V. Teague
. Appeal No. 01-3053-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-3030 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4594 - 2005-03-31

State v. Katrina D. Campbell
. Appeal No. 02-2558-CR Cir. Ct. No. 01 CF 1336 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5696 - 2005-03-31

State v. Frank A. H.
. Appeal No. 02-0762-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-326 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5061 - 2005-03-31