Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1871 - 1880 of 29713 for des.
Search results 1871 - 1880 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
21A471
; see also Johnson v. De Grandy, 512 U. S. 997, 1011–1012 (1994) (satisfying the Gingles preconditions
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/21a471_additionalauthority.pdf - 2022-03-23
; see also Johnson v. De Grandy, 512 U. S. 997, 1011–1012 (1994) (satisfying the Gingles preconditions
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/21a471_additionalauthority.pdf - 2022-03-23
[PDF]
WI App 59
, THOMAS H. HARTSHORNE, FRANCIS ANNE INNISS, MARGARET INNISS DE SUAREZ AND MARGARET BRYAN CARRASCO
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194452 - 2018-08-23
, THOMAS H. HARTSHORNE, FRANCIS ANNE INNISS, MARGARET INNISS DE SUAREZ AND MARGARET BRYAN CARRASCO
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194452 - 2018-08-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
one firearm, and the sixth was fired from another. ¶9 The jury also heard testimony from Lisa De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701789 - 2023-09-12
one firearm, and the sixth was fired from another. ¶9 The jury also heard testimony from Lisa De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701789 - 2023-09-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
should be entertained. ¶8 Angela F., proceeding pro se, petitioned the circuit court for de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101997 - 2017-09-21
should be entertained. ¶8 Angela F., proceeding pro se, petitioned the circuit court for de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101997 - 2017-09-21
Catherine G. Henry, M.D. v. Riverwood Clinic
We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Voss v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10567 - 2005-03-31
We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Voss v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10567 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court concluded on its de novo review that 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78454 - 2014-09-15
. The circuit court concluded on its de novo review that 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78454 - 2014-09-15
State v. Eduardo Alicea
omitted). Whether the State has met this high burden is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4907 - 2005-03-31
omitted). Whether the State has met this high burden is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4907 - 2005-03-31
State v. Alvin M. Moore
be brought as a single count. See Anderson, 219 Wis. 2d at 751. This analysis is conducted de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24521 - 2006-04-25
be brought as a single count. See Anderson, 219 Wis. 2d at 751. This analysis is conducted de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24521 - 2006-04-25
COURT OF APPEALS
do not remand when the issues raised are otherwise addressed by us de novo. See State v. McDermott
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99684 - 2013-07-22
do not remand when the issues raised are otherwise addressed by us de novo. See State v. McDermott
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99684 - 2013-07-22
[PDF]
AT&T Communications of Wisconsin v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
. AT&T states that “[i]ssues of statutory construction are questions of law and subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18779 - 2017-09-21
. AT&T states that “[i]ssues of statutory construction are questions of law and subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18779 - 2017-09-21