Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18711 - 18720 of 29942 for des.
Search results 18711 - 18720 of 29942 for des.
2008 WI APP 98
) to undisputed facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Hamm v. LIRC, 223 Wis. 2d 183, 190, 588 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32747 - 2008-06-24
) to undisputed facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Hamm v. LIRC, 223 Wis. 2d 183, 190, 588 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32747 - 2008-06-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not look outside the instrument’s four corners to ascertain the parties’ intent, and we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155585 - 2017-09-21
not look outside the instrument’s four corners to ascertain the parties’ intent, and we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155585 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a statute de novo. State v. Wood, 2010 WI 17, ¶15, 323 Wis. 2d 321, 780 N.W.2d 63. The party bringing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155567 - 2017-09-21
to a statute de novo. State v. Wood, 2010 WI 17, ¶15, 323 Wis. 2d 321, 780 N.W.2d 63. The party bringing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155567 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
.2d 233. “We review a dismissal for failure to state a claim de novo, accepting the facts alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390736 - 2021-07-14
.2d 233. “We review a dismissal for failure to state a claim de novo, accepting the facts alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390736 - 2021-07-14
[PDF]
State v. Peter Jay Bartram
contends that the trial court’s determination is a legal conclusion and is therefore subject to our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15790 - 2017-09-21
contends that the trial court’s determination is a legal conclusion and is therefore subject to our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15790 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Curtis L. Levy, Jr.
prejudiced the defense, are questions of law we review de novo. Id. ¶10 Levy argues his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17649 - 2017-09-21
prejudiced the defense, are questions of law we review de novo. Id. ¶10 Levy argues his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17649 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the Ozaukee County Circuit Court requesting a trial de novo. About a month after Koziol filed her notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=434106 - 2021-10-06
with the Ozaukee County Circuit Court requesting a trial de novo. About a month after Koziol filed her notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=434106 - 2021-10-06
[PDF]
State v. Thomas W. Jackson
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Reyes v. Greatway Ins. Co., 227 Wis. 2d 357, 364
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15467 - 2017-09-21
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Reyes v. Greatway Ins. Co., 227 Wis. 2d 357, 364
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15467 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Claus Bruestle
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Baratka, 2002 WI App 288, ¶7, 258 Wis. 2d 342, 654 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7455 - 2017-09-20
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Baratka, 2002 WI App 288, ¶7, 258 Wis. 2d 342, 654 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7455 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 274 Wis. 2d at 576, 682 N.W.2d at 437. The facial sufficiency of the motion is subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95802 - 2014-09-15
, 274 Wis. 2d at 576, 682 N.W.2d at 437. The facial sufficiency of the motion is subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95802 - 2014-09-15