Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18721 - 18730 of 29832 for des.
Search results 18721 - 18730 of 29832 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 179, 709 N.W.2d 893. ¶12 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85767 - 2012-08-06
review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 179, 709 N.W.2d 893. ¶12 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85767 - 2012-08-06
[PDF]
James E. Turner v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
conclusions of law and statutory interpretation: great weight, due weight and de novo. Great weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6564 - 2017-09-19
conclusions of law and statutory interpretation: great weight, due weight and de novo. Great weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6564 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Cindy L. Grothe v. Valley Coatings, Inc.
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2306 - 2017-09-19
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2306 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a legal question that this court reviews de novo. Manke v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wis., 2006 WI App 50
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=442004 - 2021-10-20
is a legal question that this court reviews de novo. Manke v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wis., 2006 WI App 50
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=442004 - 2021-10-20
[PDF]
State v. Virtis A.
review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6667 - 2017-09-20
review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6667 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Mary K. Sulzer v. Mary Susan Diedrich
the trial court utilized the proper legal standard is a question of law we review de novo. Three & One Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4799 - 2017-09-20
the trial court utilized the proper legal standard is a question of law we review de novo. Three & One Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4799 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See id. “If the motion raises such facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250590 - 2019-11-21
. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See id. “If the motion raises such facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250590 - 2019-11-21
[PDF]
Donald L. Demmer v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
, that our review is de novo. Kotecki & Radtke, S.C. v. Johnson, 192 Wis.2d 429, 436, 531 N.W.2d 606, 609
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8634 - 2017-09-19
, that our review is de novo. Kotecki & Radtke, S.C. v. Johnson, 192 Wis.2d 429, 436, 531 N.W.2d 606, 609
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8634 - 2017-09-19
County of Green Lake v. Clinton L. Duhm
is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision. State v. Fields
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6056 - 2010-10-11
is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision. State v. Fields
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6056 - 2010-10-11
[PDF]
Pamela J. Kranski v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
, which we review de novo. Smith v. Katz, 226 No. 99-2652 5 Wis. 2d 798, 805, 595 N.W.2d 345
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16095 - 2017-09-21
, which we review de novo. Smith v. Katz, 226 No. 99-2652 5 Wis. 2d 798, 805, 595 N.W.2d 345
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16095 - 2017-09-21