Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18721 - 18730 of 29848 for des.
Search results 18721 - 18730 of 29848 for des.
County of Green Lake v. Clinton L. Duhm
is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision. State v. Fields
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6056 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision. State v. Fields
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6056 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13174 - 2017-09-21
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13174 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviewed de novo. Id. ¶10 Counsel’s performance is “constitutionally deficient if it falls below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74183 - 2014-09-15
reviewed de novo. Id. ¶10 Counsel’s performance is “constitutionally deficient if it falls below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74183 - 2014-09-15
State v. Orzell P. Grinnage
is an issue this court reviews de novo. See id. at 127-28, 449 N.W.2d at 848
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14260 - 2005-03-31
is an issue this court reviews de novo. See id. at 127-28, 449 N.W.2d at 848
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14260 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69079 - 2011-08-03
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69079 - 2011-08-03
[PDF]
State v. Lisa K. Kraus
facts establish probable cause to arrest is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15478 - 2017-09-21
facts establish probable cause to arrest is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15478 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Harry Montey
are questions of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13694 - 2014-09-15
are questions of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13694 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
grant of summary judgment is de novo. Post v. Schwall, 157 Wis. 2d 652, 656, 460 N.W.2d 794 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158194 - 2017-09-21
grant of summary judgment is de novo. Post v. Schwall, 157 Wis. 2d 652, 656, 460 N.W.2d 794 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158194 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the Ozaukee County Circuit Court requesting a trial de novo. About a month after Koziol filed her notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=434106 - 2021-10-06
with the Ozaukee County Circuit Court requesting a trial de novo. About a month after Koziol filed her notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=434106 - 2021-10-06
[PDF]
Glinder Drake v. Marcia E. Huber
judgment. See RULE 802.06(2)(b), STATS. Our review of a trial court’s denial of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11569 - 2017-09-19
judgment. See RULE 802.06(2)(b), STATS. Our review of a trial court’s denial of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11569 - 2017-09-19