Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18731 - 18740 of 46662 for adult name change.

Kim T. Timm v. Dennis L. Timm
1994, both Kim and Dennis petitioned for a change of the physical placement schedule. The end result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9659 - 2005-03-31

Gary Martin Krutke v. Jodi Ann Krutke
no substantial change of circumstances. He further argued that the child was not in need of additional support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7602 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
2016, Kenneth sought a change of primary placement and an order that certain medical treatment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247965 - 2019-10-09

[PDF] Cun Xin Zheng v. Bradley Operating Limited Partnership
been signed, we will adjust the billings and your account to reflect the changes.” The letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21408 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] James Cape & Sons Co. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
decided to realign the sewer to avoid moving some power lines. Cape submitted a change order which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7443 - 2017-09-20

Preston W. McGuire v. Danielle M. McGuire
appeals an order changing the primary physical placement of her daughter, Stephanie McGuire. The issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2175 - 2005-03-31

James Cape & Sons Co. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
the sewer to avoid moving some power lines. Cape submitted a change order which the DOT accepted after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7443 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
concluded that nothing had changed since his commitment and denied the request for discharge. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93285 - 2013-02-26

State v. Orbbie Williams
court erred when it resentenced him because it did not consider the change in the primary sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19806 - 2005-10-03

State v. Joshua W.
was amenable to an earlier date, should the changing schedules of the attorneys permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9444 - 2005-03-31