Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18731 - 18740 of 39129 for c's.
Search results 18731 - 18740 of 39129 for c's.
State v. Roger A. McGinnis
a forfeiture, § 343.44(2)(c)2, Stats., does not apply. See State v. Biljan, 177 Wis.2d 14, 20, 501 N.W.2d 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9887 - 2005-03-31
a forfeiture, § 343.44(2)(c)2, Stats., does not apply. See State v. Biljan, 177 Wis.2d 14, 20, 501 N.W.2d 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9887 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
c. stewart, jr., Judge. Reversed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32798 - 2008-05-27
c. stewart, jr., Judge. Reversed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32798 - 2008-05-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
litigation, Ezell stated in her postconviction motion that she was “bringing [her claims] on [c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57518 - 2014-09-15
litigation, Ezell stated in her postconviction motion that she was “bringing [her claims] on [c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57518 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
809.25(3)(c). Peterson has had actual notice of our standards for frivolous appeals. See Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165189 - 2017-09-21
809.25(3)(c). Peterson has had actual notice of our standards for frivolous appeals. See Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165189 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2011-12). All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101813 - 2017-09-21
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2011-12). All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101813 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
John E. Pickel v. John Harr, Jr.
“perfection” as “taxation of costs.” Section 806.06(1)(c), STATS. We must read statutes sensibly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11831 - 2017-09-21
“perfection” as “taxation of costs.” Section 806.06(1)(c), STATS. We must read statutes sensibly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11831 - 2017-09-21
State v. David A. Plotkin
to § 941.20(1)(c), Stats. Plotkin seeks a new trial based on his contention that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9334 - 2005-03-31
to § 941.20(1)(c), Stats. Plotkin seeks a new trial based on his contention that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9334 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Sandles
court for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Curley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21257 - 2017-09-21
court for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Curley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21257 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an order of the circuit court for Washington County: DAVID C. RESHESKE, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 REILLY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66570 - 2014-09-15
an order of the circuit court for Washington County: DAVID C. RESHESKE, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 REILLY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66570 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jywanza C. Carter
, v. Jywanza C. Carter, Defendant-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3109 - 2005-03-31
, v. Jywanza C. Carter, Defendant-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3109 - 2005-03-31