Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18731 - 18740 of 98460 for court records search online.
Search results 18731 - 18740 of 98460 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
by the record. The court noted the property was sold for a price in excess of appraised value. The lessee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98271 - 2013-06-17
by the record. The court noted the property was sold for a price in excess of appraised value. The lessee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98271 - 2013-06-17
State v. Ralph D. Armstrong
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 27, 2004 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5861 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 27, 2004 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5861 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ralph D. Armstrong
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 27, 2004 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4499 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 27, 2004 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4499 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
This court rejected Ward’s argument that he was entitled to reconstruct the record concerning the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108920 - 2014-03-10
This court rejected Ward’s argument that he was entitled to reconstruct the record concerning the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108920 - 2014-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS
the recorded call and taking into account that the case had “been pending for quite awhile,” the court made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60511 - 2011-02-28
the recorded call and taking into account that the case had “been pending for quite awhile,” the court made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60511 - 2011-02-28
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 28, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38397 - 2009-07-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 28, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38397 - 2009-07-27
COURT OF APPEALS
. History in hospital record ¶30 White argues that the circuit court erroneously allowed defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138941 - 2015-04-01
. History in hospital record ¶30 White argues that the circuit court erroneously allowed defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138941 - 2015-04-01
COURT OF APPEALS
our review of the record, we are not persuaded that the trial court considered inaccurate or disputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34641 - 2008-11-18
our review of the record, we are not persuaded that the trial court considered inaccurate or disputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34641 - 2008-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
are sufficiently supported by the record. We therefore affirm the portion of the circuit court’s judgment ordering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118874 - 2014-08-04
are sufficiently supported by the record. We therefore affirm the portion of the circuit court’s judgment ordering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118874 - 2014-08-04
COURT OF APPEALS
is that the circuit court erred by allowing into evidence the recorded statements of two witnesses to the shooting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95346 - 2013-04-10
is that the circuit court erred by allowing into evidence the recorded statements of two witnesses to the shooting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95346 - 2013-04-10