Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18741 - 18750 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 18741 - 18750 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denied. On de novo review, the trial court entered an order indefinitely extending Ronald’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100829 - 2017-09-21
denied. On de novo review, the trial court entered an order indefinitely extending Ronald’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100829 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kenneth L. Larson
, in violation of § 161.41(1m), Stats., 1991-92.[1] He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9365 - 2005-03-31
, in violation of § 161.41(1m), Stats., 1991-92.[1] He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9365 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of a child. Lange argues his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to object to several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120636 - 2014-09-02
of a child. Lange argues his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to object to several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120636 - 2014-09-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶1 PER CURIAM. Colton C. Schneider appeals from a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875219 - 2024-11-12
¶1 PER CURIAM. Colton C. Schneider appeals from a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875219 - 2024-11-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was insufficiently detailed to support a finding of probable cause. The trial court denied the motion. The trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355505 - 2021-04-13
was insufficiently detailed to support a finding of probable cause. The trial court denied the motion. The trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355505 - 2021-04-13
[PDF]
State v. Dale H. Chu
to exculpatory evidence, sufficiency of the evidence, ineffective assistance of counsel and the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4200 - 2017-09-19
to exculpatory evidence, sufficiency of the evidence, ineffective assistance of counsel and the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4200 - 2017-09-19
State v. Andrew D.W.
] ¶2 Andrew argues that: (1) the trial court erred by denying Andrew a substitution of judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15598 - 2005-03-31
] ¶2 Andrew argues that: (1) the trial court erred by denying Andrew a substitution of judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15598 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph F. Volk
¶2 Volk makes two arguments on appeal. First, he argues that the trial court erred in admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4692 - 2017-09-19
¶2 Volk makes two arguments on appeal. First, he argues that the trial court erred in admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4692 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 120
trial lawyer executed a “Plea Questionnaire/Waiver of Rights” form. Hudson represented on the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101643 - 2017-09-21
trial lawyer executed a “Plea Questionnaire/Waiver of Rights” form. Hudson represented on the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101643 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph F. Volk
for postconviction relief.[2] ¶2 Volk makes two arguments on appeal. First, he argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4692 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief.[2] ¶2 Volk makes two arguments on appeal. First, he argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4692 - 2005-03-31