Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18751 - 18760 of 29828 for des.

[PDF] State v. Ronald W. Wolfe
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. This court need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5896 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 65
to undisputed facts are questions of law we determine de novo. State v. Jones, 2018 WI 44, ¶27, 381 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283181 - 2020-11-11

[PDF] Ronald W. Morters v. Charles H. Barr
, however, presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. Id. ¶10 In the instant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5653 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
, who have already exhausted their direct appeals is an issue of law that we decide de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5543 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
restitution presents a question of statutory interpretation subject to de novo review. State v. Ziegler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622237 - 2023-02-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Fischer, 2010 WI 6, ¶15, 322 Wis. 2d 265, 778 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95705 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a settlement agreement is binding and thus enforceable by a court is a question of law we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139585 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
grant of summary judgment is de novo. Post v. Schwall, 157 Wis. 2d 652, 656, 460 N.W.2d 794 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158194 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James A. Fischer
of reasonableness is a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis.2d 51, 54, 556
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14122 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Fred J. Perri v. Diocese of La Crosse
the same methodology as the trial court and review its decision de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8582 - 2017-09-19