Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18761 - 18770 of 59342 for quit claim deed.
Search results 18761 - 18770 of 59342 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and 3 A Machner hearing addresses a defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim. See State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202170 - 2017-11-15
and 3 A Machner hearing addresses a defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim. See State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202170 - 2017-11-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. ¶10 Locke’s first claim for sentence modification is based on a new factor—namely, that one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279864 - 2020-08-18
. Id. ¶10 Locke’s first claim for sentence modification is based on a new factor—namely, that one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279864 - 2020-08-18
[PDF]
State v. Edward D. Lewis
motion to modify his sentence. Lewis claims: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3610 - 2017-09-19
motion to modify his sentence. Lewis claims: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3610 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 HRUZ, J.1 Harry M. Wirth, pro se, appeals a judgment dismissing his claim against Mart W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088393 - 2026-03-10
. ¶1 HRUZ, J.1 Harry M. Wirth, pro se, appeals a judgment dismissing his claim against Mart W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088393 - 2026-03-10
Faith Tasker v. Chieftain Wildrice Company
a summary judgment dismissing her claims against Chieftain Wildrice Company. Tasker argues that Chieftain’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5458 - 2005-03-31
a summary judgment dismissing her claims against Chieftain Wildrice Company. Tasker argues that Chieftain’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5458 - 2005-03-31
Ronald A. Schaefer v. Mark T. Ulinski
corporate documents. We conclude that the trial court properly applied the law and that Schaefer’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3639 - 2005-03-31
corporate documents. We conclude that the trial court properly applied the law and that Schaefer’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3639 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Calvin R. Clemons
to § 948.02(2), STATS. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Clemons claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12299 - 2017-09-21
to § 948.02(2), STATS. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Clemons claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12299 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael S. Kazanjian
filed a pro se motion to withdraw his guilty plea, which included claims of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15483 - 2005-03-31
filed a pro se motion to withdraw his guilty plea, which included claims of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15483 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Wayne L. Koenig v. Donald Aldrich
their claim for adverse possession of a four-acre parcel of land owned by Donald, Arlene and Timothy Aldrich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21309 - 2017-09-21
their claim for adverse possession of a four-acre parcel of land owned by Donald, Arlene and Timothy Aldrich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21309 - 2017-09-21
Wayne L. Koenig v. Donald Aldrich
CURIAM. Wayne and Sharon Koenig appeal a judgment denying their claim for adverse possession of a four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21309 - 2006-02-06
CURIAM. Wayne and Sharon Koenig appeal a judgment denying their claim for adverse possession of a four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21309 - 2006-02-06