Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18771 - 18780 of 40048 for financial disclosure statements.
Search results 18771 - 18780 of 40048 for financial disclosure statements.
State v. Faye W. Lloyd
is predicated on a statement made by the State during closing arguments. She contends that the State referred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9595 - 2005-03-31
is predicated on a statement made by the State during closing arguments. She contends that the State referred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9595 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gerald A. Cholewinski
and in statements made by counsel and the trial court; (2) Cholewinski is hearing-impaired and he was unable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8092 - 2017-09-19
and in statements made by counsel and the trial court; (2) Cholewinski is hearing-impaired and he was unable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8092 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Yolanda M.
society [and] probably fears it”; and (3) “[t]he statement that [Yolanda] had allowed over three months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2363 - 2017-09-19
society [and] probably fears it”; and (3) “[t]he statement that [Yolanda] had allowed over three months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2363 - 2017-09-19
State v. Rudy A. Gerardo
was, in fact, induced by concern over Juror 57’s statement and the judge’s reaction to it. His answers during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13508 - 2005-03-31
was, in fact, induced by concern over Juror 57’s statement and the judge’s reaction to it. His answers during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13508 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roger M. Smejkal
has not shown that the trial court relied on its statement. See id., ¶22. In fact, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6600 - 2005-03-31
has not shown that the trial court relied on its statement. See id., ¶22. In fact, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6600 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gregory Jordan
accomplice, whom the clerk could not identify) and Howell. When confronted with his signed statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10995 - 2005-03-31
accomplice, whom the clerk could not identify) and Howell. When confronted with his signed statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10995 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Edward L. Snider
3 We note that Snider’s statement of the case, statement of facts and argument contain just one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4673 - 2017-09-19
3 We note that Snider’s statement of the case, statement of facts and argument contain just one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4673 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or conform his behavior to the requirements of the law.” Ashley later moved to suppress his statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540670 - 2022-07-06
or conform his behavior to the requirements of the law.” Ashley later moved to suppress his statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540670 - 2022-07-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. With this motion he included a two-page handwritten statement signed “Andre Simpson- Lackey.” In the statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=475915 - 2022-01-25
. With this motion he included a two-page handwritten statement signed “Andre Simpson- Lackey.” In the statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=475915 - 2022-01-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
with the statement by Hollida Wakefield given in an interview in 1993 in the Journal of Pedophilia that, “We can’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57556 - 2014-09-15
with the statement by Hollida Wakefield given in an interview in 1993 in the Journal of Pedophilia that, “We can’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57556 - 2014-09-15