Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18771 - 18780 of 39839 for financial disclosure statements.
Search results 18771 - 18780 of 39839 for financial disclosure statements.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“is to ensure the reliability of testimony by allowing the accused to challenge a witness’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701311 - 2023-09-12
“is to ensure the reliability of testimony by allowing the accused to challenge a witness’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701311 - 2023-09-12
State v. Andrew M. Hansen
, 675 N.W.2d 804 (Wis. Jan. 23, 2004) (No. 02‑1670-CR). ¶9 Hearsay is a statement, other than one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7348 - 2005-03-31
, 675 N.W.2d 804 (Wis. Jan. 23, 2004) (No. 02‑1670-CR). ¶9 Hearsay is a statement, other than one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7348 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that he seeks to appeal; (2) a statement setting forth the specific grounds upon which this court could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011166 - 2025-09-16
that he seeks to appeal; (2) a statement setting forth the specific grounds upon which this court could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011166 - 2025-09-16
[PDF]
State v. Jerry D. Gragg
The following statement of facts is based on testimony from the motion hearing before the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7633 - 2017-09-19
The following statement of facts is based on testimony from the motion hearing before the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7633 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Joubert is concerned about the cross-examination regarding a statement he was said to have made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181429 - 2017-09-21
, Joubert is concerned about the cross-examination regarding a statement he was said to have made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181429 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Scott D. Worsech
and Mike Koprek, as well as statements made by Worsech and the alleged victim, Paul Pearson. ¶3 While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4853 - 2017-09-19
and Mike Koprek, as well as statements made by Worsech and the alleged victim, Paul Pearson. ¶3 While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4853 - 2017-09-19
State v. Julian C. Holt
, Holt contends that various of the prosecutor's statements at closing arguments so infected his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9251 - 2005-03-31
, Holt contends that various of the prosecutor's statements at closing arguments so infected his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9251 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶6 D’Amico then gave a statement in which he admitted that he had argued with the victim when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94600 - 2013-03-27
. ¶6 D’Amico then gave a statement in which he admitted that he had argued with the victim when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94600 - 2013-03-27
State v. Darnial C. Craig
on the record. We conclude that the objection was preserved. ¶4 During the State’s opening statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2860 - 2005-03-31
on the record. We conclude that the objection was preserved. ¶4 During the State’s opening statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2860 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald J. Dockry
) the witness’s statement that Dockry smelled drunk, (2) the unexplained erratic driving that caused a serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2863 - 2005-03-31
) the witness’s statement that Dockry smelled drunk, (2) the unexplained erratic driving that caused a serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2863 - 2005-03-31