Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18771 - 18780 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 18771 - 18780 of 58547 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, “the Coughlins”) appeal from a judgment of the trial court regarding the boundary between their property
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932367 - 2025-03-26
, “the Coughlins”) appeal from a judgment of the trial court regarding the boundary between their property
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932367 - 2025-03-26
[PDF]
State v. Charles L. Stewart
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims the trial court erred in admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4349 - 2017-09-19
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims the trial court erred in admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4349 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
merit: whether the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105383 - 2013-12-12
merit: whether the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105383 - 2013-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS
to a new trial in the interest of justice. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52020 - 2010-07-14
to a new trial in the interest of justice. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52020 - 2010-07-14
[PDF]
State v. James H. Lindvig
in violation of § 940.24, STATS. Lindvig argues that the trial court erred: (1) in denying his request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10302 - 2017-09-20
in violation of § 940.24, STATS. Lindvig argues that the trial court erred: (1) in denying his request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10302 - 2017-09-20
Amanda Gomilla v. Libertas
Gomilla contends that the trial court erred by improperly fashioning a verdict that: (1) allowed the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15992 - 2005-03-31
Gomilla contends that the trial court erred by improperly fashioning a verdict that: (1) allowed the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15992 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Paul Sappington
his no contest plea, his trial counsel No. 99-2969-CR 2 was ineffective and the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16200 - 2017-09-21
his no contest plea, his trial counsel No. 99-2969-CR 2 was ineffective and the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16200 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the jurors did not hear, or chose not to listen to, material portions of the trial. Specifically, Presby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29151 - 2014-09-15
of the jurors did not hear, or chose not to listen to, material portions of the trial. Specifically, Presby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29151 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of cocaine, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 940.25(1)(am) (2003-04). Prior to trial, McCarthy alleged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247944 - 2019-10-01
of cocaine, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 940.25(1)(am) (2003-04). Prior to trial, McCarthy alleged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247944 - 2019-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS
of about thirty years. See Wis. Stat. § 943.20(1) and (3)(c) (2009-10).[1] At trial, the State presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64800 - 2011-05-31
of about thirty years. See Wis. Stat. § 943.20(1) and (3)(c) (2009-10).[1] At trial, the State presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64800 - 2011-05-31